Law enforcement officials in the United States have initiated civil forfeiture proceedings to seize $7.1 million worth of cryptocurrency assets tied to an elaborate oil-and-gas investment fraud. The scam, which spanned across two years—from June 2022 to July 2024—saw criminals dupe investors by promising large returns from fictitious oil tank storage deals.
The civil action, filed by the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Western District of Washington, represents a growing effort to recover funds lost to digital financial crimes. The seized crypto represents just a fraction—about 7%—of the total estimated losses, which have reached approximately $97 million. If the forfeiture is approved, the government plans to return these assets to the defrauded victims.
Fraud Mechanics and Modus Operandi
The scheme operated under the guise of a legitimate oil and gas storage investment opportunity. Fraudsters claimed they were acquiring tank storage facilities in major global hubs—specifically Rotterdam, Netherlands, and Houston, Texas. Investors were lured in with promises of lucrative profits by subleasing this storage to oil trading companies.
Victims transferred funds with the belief that their capital was being used to secure ownership or lease rights to these storage tanks. However, the perpetrators had no intention of fulfilling these promises. Once the money was received, all communications from the scam operators ceased. Investors were left without any updates or returns.
The scam was executed using a web of shell companies and false documentation, creating an illusion of operational legitimacy. The funds, once collected, were diverted through a maze of domestic and international financial institutions and crypto exchanges.
Funds Flow and Crypto Asset Conversion
Authorities investigating the case revealed that the criminals utilized at least 81 traditional financial accounts and 19 crypto wallets to launder the stolen assets. The funds were transferred internationally, exchanged into cryptocurrency, and then rerouted multiple times.
The assets were converted into well-known digital currencies such as Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), Tether (USDT), and USD Coin (USDC). Much of this digital currency was ultimately transferred to large crypto exchanges, including offshore platforms.
Investigators believe that some of these funds ended up in the hands of platforms located in Russia and Nigeria. Some of these crypto exchanges have been previously flagged by law enforcement agencies for enabling money laundering and facilitating financial operations linked to international criminal and even terrorist organizations.
Key Seizures and Individuals Involved
As part of the investigation, a Newcastle, Washington resident—Geoffrey K. Auyeung, aged 47—was identified as one of the key recipients of the stolen funds. Law enforcement successfully seized approximately $2.3 million from his bank accounts. He has since been charged with financial crimes related to his role in the fraud.
The crypto assets currently under forfeiture proceedings are suspected to be linked to a larger syndicate operating globally. While some of the funds have been tied to anonymous individuals in Russia and Nigeria, investigations remain ongoing to track additional collaborators and financial flows.
Civil Forfeiture Action and Legal Ramifications
Civil forfeiture is a legal process that allows authorities to seize property or assets suspected of being connected to criminal activity, even if the asset holder has not been criminally convicted. In this case, the U.S. government is seeking to permanently seize the $7.1 million in digital assets, with the goal of returning them to the victims.
The forfeiture process is being conducted alongside ongoing criminal investigations and potential prosecutions. Prosecutors have signaled that additional charges may follow as more individuals and shell entities are identified.
Once the forfeiture is approved, victims of the fraud can file claims for restitution. This process typically involves submitting proof of losses, such as transaction records, communication logs with the scammers, and investment documents.
Challenges in Crypto Asset Recovery
The relatively small percentage of recovered funds illustrates the complexities of tracking and reclaiming assets in the cryptocurrency space. Unlike traditional bank transfers, crypto transactions are irreversible and often involve layers of obfuscation.
Offshore wallets, privacy coins, and the lack of universal regulation make enforcement difficult. Some exchanges, particularly those in jurisdictions with weak compliance regimes, do not cooperate with international investigations.
Despite this, Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) has made significant strides in utilizing blockchain analytics tools to monitor transactions, trace fund movements, and identify wallet ownership patterns.
Use of Blockchain Forensics
Modern financial crime investigations rely heavily on blockchain analytics. Using transaction mapping, authorities are able to:
-
Cluster wallet addresses based on transaction history
-
Monitor deposits and withdrawals to/from known exchange addresses
-
Trace links between fiat and crypto flows through KYC-verified exchange accounts
This combination of data analytics and traditional financial surveillance has proven critical in seizing digital assets tied to illegal activities.
Victim Profile and Scale
Authorities have so far identified dozens of victims, most of whom are individual investors. However, officials believe the number could rise substantially as more complaints surface and forensic analysis expands.
Based on current reports, victims are believed to have collectively lost at least $18 million. However, with the larger fraud operation estimated at nearly $97 million, a much broader web of affected investors is likely.
Some victims were recruited via personal networks, online investment forums, or professional referrals—further masking the fraudulent intent behind the scheme.
Potential Payouts and Restitution Plans
If the forfeiture is approved, the $7.1 million in crypto, along with the $2.3 million already seized from Auyeung’s accounts, will be pooled for victim restitution. This would bring the total recoverable amount to roughly $9.4 million.
Restitution amounts will depend on:
-
The number of verified claims
-
Size of individual investments
-
The cost and administrative overhead of distributing the assets
As is typical with such cases, full restitution for all victims is unlikely, but partial recoveries are possible based on available funds.
Regulatory and Sector Implications
This case underscores the urgent need for stronger crypto regulation, especially in:
-
AML (Anti-Money Laundering) compliance
-
KYC (Know Your Customer) procedures
-
International data-sharing frameworks between exchanges and enforcement agencies
U.S. regulators and agencies are increasingly focusing on the intersection of fraud and cryptocurrency, especially as decentralized finance becomes more mainstream.
The enforcement action in this case may also serve as a model for future efforts to dismantle and penalize crypto-linked Ponzi schemes and false investment offerings.
Lessons for Investors
Investors are urged to practice extreme caution when evaluating investment opportunities—especially those involving:
-
Promises of guaranteed or abnormally high returns
-
Pressure to act quickly
-
Lack of verifiable documentation or corporate registration
-
Poorly explained business models
In this case, many victims were lured by the prospect of investing in physical oil tank storage—an industry that naturally involves high capital expenditure and longer-term yield cycles. The unrealistic timelines and return projections should have been early warning signs.
Conclusion: A Case With Global Reach
The $7.1 million civil forfeiture case involving cryptocurrency seized in an oil-and-gas fraud scheme marks a significant milestone in the fight against digital financial crimes. Although the amount represents a small portion of total estimated losses, it provides hope for restitution and sets a legal precedent.
The case highlights:
-
The vulnerability of investors to increasingly sophisticated scams
-
The evolving capabilities of law enforcement in tracking crypto assets
-
The critical role of international collaboration in asset recovery
As investigations proceed and additional funds are traced, the U.S. government aims to recover as much of the stolen wealth as possible and return it to rightful owners. Meanwhile, this case stands as a cautionary tale and a call to tighten regulatory oversight in a rapidly evolving financial landscape.
ALSO READ: Divine Deception: Pastor’s $3M Crypto Scam Unveiled
