Celsius freezing withdrawals

In the summer of 2022, the cryptocurrency industry experienced one of its most defining crises. Celsius Network, a once-celebrated crypto lender boasting billions of dollars in customer deposits, stunned the world by freezing all withdrawals, swaps, and transfers on June 12, 2022. This decision not only trapped billions in user funds but also symbolized the fragility of the high-yield promises that dominated the industry.

The Celsius freeze became a watershed moment in the “crypto winter” of 2022, alongside the collapse of Terra/Luna, Three Arrows Capital, Voyager, and eventually FTX. For hundreds of thousands of investors, it meant shattered trust, financial losses, and the beginning of a prolonged legal and regulatory saga.

This article explores the rise of Celsius, the risky bets behind its downfall, the events leading to the withdrawal freeze, the bankruptcy process, and the broader lessons for the cryptocurrency ecosystem.

The Rise of Celsius: From Startup to Powerhouse

Celsius Network was founded in 2017 by entrepreneur Alex Mashinsky and technologist Daniel Leon. Its mission was to “unbank the banked”—providing fair financial services powered by crypto, outside the reach of traditional institutions.

The business model was simple yet compelling:

• Users deposited cryptocurrency like Bitcoin, Ethereum, or stablecoins into Celsius accounts.

• Celsius lent those assets to institutional investors, DeFi protocols, and trading desks.

• The interest generated was used to pay depositors yields that far exceeded those of traditional banks—sometimes up to 18% annually.

By late 2021, Celsius had:

• Over $25 billion in assets under management.

• More than 1.7 million users worldwide.

• A slick marketing strategy positioning itself as safer and more transparent than rivals.

It built strong community engagement, often emphasizing the “Celsius flywheel”—a claim that customer assets were always used responsibly, generating sustainable returns.

However, beneath the marketing veneer, Celsius was engaged in risky investments and leveraged bets that left it dangerously exposed to market volatility.

The Cracks Begin to Show

The crypto bull market of 2020–2021 masked many underlying issues. As long as Bitcoin and Ethereum were rising, Celsius could cover its obligations. But when crypto prices began falling in early 2022, problems surfaced.

Key stress factors included:

1. Exposure to Terra’s Anchor Protocol
   Celsius placed significant deposits in Terra’s Anchor Protocol, which promised nearly 20% yields on stablecoin TerraUSD (UST). When UST collapsed in May 2022, Celsius lost heavily.

2. Loans to High-Risk Counterparties
   Celsius extended loans to hedge funds and other firms like Three Arrows Capital (3AC), which itself collapsed soon after. These borrowers defaulted as the market crumbled.

3. Liquidity Mismatch
   Celsius promised instant withdrawals to users but had locked many funds into long-term, illiquid investments. When customers rushed to withdraw, Celsius had no way to meet the demand.

4. Overreliance on Token Collateral
   A large part of Celsius’s balance sheet was tied up in its own native token, CEL, and volatile assets like Ethereum staked derivatives (stETH). When these lost value, Celsius’s liabilities far outweighed its assets.

By June 2022, Celsius was running out of cash.

The Freeze: June 12, 2022

On the evening of June 12, Celsius stunned its community with a blog post:

“Due to extreme market conditions, today we are announcing that Celsius is pausing all withdrawals, Swap, and transfers between accounts. We are taking this action today to put Celsius in a better position to honor, over time, its withdrawal obligations.”

This announcement marked one of the largest-ever freezes in crypto history.

Immediate Consequences:

• User Panic: Hundreds of thousands of customers suddenly could not access their funds.

• Market Shockwaves: Bitcoin and Ethereum prices dropped further as fears of contagion spread.

• Liquidity Crisis: Other crypto lenders faced bank-run-like pressure, leading to similar halts at Voyager and others.

The freeze was essentially a bank run prevented by force. Celsius had promised daily access to funds but had invested too heavily in long-term bets that could not be liquidated quickly.

Bankruptcy Filing

On July 13, 2022, just a month after halting withdrawals, Celsius filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in New York.

Key details from the filing:

• Liabilities: $5.5 billion.

• Assets: $4.3 billion.

• Customer obligations: $4.7 billion owed to more than 100,000 creditors.

• Liquidity shortfall: Over $1 billion.

The filing also revealed Celsius had lost vast amounts through poor risk management and questionable investment strategies.

The company argued that Chapter 11 would allow it to restructure, stabilize operations, and work toward customer recovery. However, trust had already evaporated.

Customer Impact

For Celsius users, the withdrawal freeze and bankruptcy were devastating:

• Trapped Savings: Many had deposited life savings or retirement funds, drawn in by high yields and marketing promises.

• Uncertain Recovery: Unlike traditional banks, Celsius deposits were not insured. Recovery depended entirely on bankruptcy proceedings.

• Token Collapse: The CEL token plummeted in value, destroying whatever confidence remained.

The emotional toll was severe, with online communities filled with stories of hardship and betrayal.

Legal and Regulatory Fallout

Celsius quickly attracted regulatory scrutiny:

1. CEO Resignation and Arrest

   • Alex Mashinsky resigned in September 2022.

   • In July 2023, he was arrested and charged with fraud, securities violations, and market manipulation. Authorities alleged he misled customers about risks and manipulated the CEL token price.

2. Regulatory Investigations

   • The SEC, CFTC, and FTC launched probes into Celsius’s business practices.

   • Multiple U.S. states also filed lawsuits alleging that Celsius offered unregistered securities and misled investors.

3. Accusations of Mismanagement
   Court documents revealed that Celsius executives withdrew millions in crypto shortly before the freeze, raising allegations of insider advantage.

Recovery Efforts

Unlike BlockFi, which secured strong claims against FTX and later recovered value, Celsius’s path to recovery was more limited. Its assets were tied up in:

• Illiquid DeFi positions.

• Collateral seized from defaulted loans.

• Real estate and mining ventures that had depreciated in value.

While some recovery plans have emerged through bankruptcy court, customers are unlikely to be made fully whole.

Timeline of Events

Broader Implications for Crypto

Celsius’s collapse underscored several truths about the crypto industry:

1. High Yields Are Unsustainable
   The 10–18% interest rates Celsius promised relied on risky, unsustainable practices.

2. Centralized Risks in “DeFi Clothing”
   Celsius branded itself as decentralized, but in reality, it was a centralized custodian with opaque operations.

3. Need for Regulation
   Without oversight, firms like Celsius could take risks comparable to hedge funds while presenting themselves as safe savings platforms.

4. Trust Deficit
   The incident eroded retail trust in centralized lending platforms, driving more users toward self-custody wallets or regulated institutions.

Lessons for Investors

The Celsius freeze carries enduring lessons for retail investors:

• Not your keys, not your coins: Holding assets on custodial platforms introduces counterparty risk.

• Diversify exposure: Never keep all crypto in a single platform, token, or strategy.

• Be skeptical of “too good to be true” yields: High returns always mean high risk.

• Demand transparency: Investors should require clear disclosures about how funds are deployed.

The Future of Crypto Lending

Despite Celsius’s collapse, crypto lending is unlikely to vanish. However, its future will likely involve:

• Stricter oversight: Regulators are already drafting rules for crypto lending and staking services.

• Institutional players: Banks and regulated firms may offer safer, lower-yield crypto lending products.

• Shift to DeFi protocols: Some investors prefer decentralized lending, where risks are visible on-chain, though smart contract risks remain.

• Conservative models: Future platforms will emphasize sustainability over aggressive growth.

Conclusion

The freezing of withdrawals by Celsius on June 12, 2022 was a turning point in crypto history. What was once a $25 billion powerhouse collapsed in a matter of weeks, exposing flaws in business models built on leverage, opacity, and hype.

For customers, it was a painful reminder that crypto platforms are not banks, and deposits are not insured. For regulators, it was a wake-up call about the dangers of unchecked innovation.

As the industry evolves, Celsius will remain a case study in how ambition and reckless promises can destroy trust overnight. For investors, its legacy is a simple but powerful lesson: in crypto, control of your assets and skepticism of easy yields are your best safeguards.

ALSO READ: Is Forex a Zero-Sum Game?