In the mid-2000s, China was the land of opportunity for foreign investors. Rapid economic growth and surging demand for financial technology made the country’s software sector particularly attractive. Among the companies riding this wave was Longtop Financial Technologies, a provider of software solutions to Chinese banks.
Longtop presented itself as a leader in financial IT services. It went public on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in 2007, marketed as the “go-to” software developer for China’s financial sector. Its stock soared, attracting prestigious institutional investors who were eager to participate in the growth of China’s digital economy.
But behind the glossy prospectuses and glowing analyst reports, Longtop’s financial statements were an elaborate fiction. The company inflated revenues, faked profits, and even forged bank confirmations to convince auditors that it held cash balances it never had.
By 2011, the truth emerged. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, Longtop’s auditor, resigned in dramatic fashion, citing falsified records and interference with audit work. Within weeks, Longtop’s stock collapsed, billions in market value were destroyed, and the scandal became one of the most notorious examples of Chinese companies “cooking the books” to defraud overseas investors.
The Rise of Longtop
Longtop Financial was founded in 1996 in Fujian Province, China, by Jia Xiao Gong. The company specialized in developing software solutions for banks, insurers, and other financial institutions. Its products included core banking systems, data analytics tools, and risk management platforms.
In the 2000s, as China’s financial sector modernized, Longtop positioned itself as a critical partner. It boasted contracts with major state-owned banks, claiming to deliver essential infrastructure for one of the fastest-growing economies in the world.
The company’s growth story appealed strongly to Western investors. In 2007, Longtop completed its IPO on the NYSE, raising nearly $300 million. Underwriters included big names like Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank. With a U.S. listing, audited financials, and the prestige of top-tier investment banks behind it, Longtop seemed like a safe bet.
By 2010, the company’s market capitalization exceeded $2 billion. Analysts praised its revenue growth and healthy margins. Its reported financial results showed explosive profitability, and its supposedly massive cash reserves reassured investors.
But all of it was smoke and mirrors.
Red Flags and the Culture of Overconfidence
Even before the scandal broke, some analysts noted oddities in Longtop’s reports:
-
Unrealistically High Margins
Longtop claimed profit margins far above industry averages. In a competitive software market, such performance seemed improbable. -
Cash Rich Yet Borrowing
Like Parmalat years earlier, Longtop reported large cash balances while also raising capital in ways that did not make sense if liquidity was genuine. -
Opaque Customer Base
Many of Longtop’s clients were not independently verifiable. Contracts with state banks were cited but rarely detailed.
Despite these signs, the momentum of China’s growth story overwhelmed skepticism. Investors wanted exposure to the “Chinese miracle.” Longtop provided it—on paper.
How Longtop Cooked the Books
The fraud involved several interlocking tactics:
-
Falsified Revenues: Longtop inflated software sales through fabricated contracts and sham transactions. Revenues were booked even when no real business took place.
-
Fake Cash Balances: The company presented forged bank statements to auditors, showing billions of yuan in deposits that did not exist.
-
Manipulated Payroll: Investigations later revealed “ghost employees” on the payroll, inflating expenses to create the illusion of a large operation.
-
Collusion with Banks: In some cases, local bank staff allegedly cooperated with Longtop in providing false confirmations of cash and accounts.
This orchestration allowed Longtop to present itself as a booming software giant when in reality its operations were far smaller and less profitable.
The Breaking Point: Deloitte’s Dramatic Resignation
The scandal exploded in May 2011. Deloitte, Longtop’s external auditor, resigned with a letter that shook markets.
In the resignation letter, Deloitte stated that:
-
Bank confirmations provided to auditors were falsified.
-
Cash balances claimed by Longtop did not exist.
-
Company officials had physically blocked Deloitte auditors from accessing certain records during the audit process.
-
Deloitte no longer had confidence in the integrity of management.
Such a blunt resignation was almost unheard of in the world of auditing. The firm essentially declared Longtop’s financial statements fraudulent. Within days, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) halted trading of Longtop’s shares.
The company never recovered. Its market value collapsed to near zero, wiping out billions of investor dollars.
Regulatory and Legal Fallout
The Longtop case became a symbol of broader concerns about Chinese companies listed in the United States. Between 2008 and 2012, dozens of U.S.-listed Chinese firms were accused of accounting irregularities, many of them reverse-merger companies that bypassed traditional IPO scrutiny.
Longtop, however, was different. It had gone through a full NYSE IPO with prestigious underwriters and a Big Four auditor. If a company like this could be fraudulent, how could investors trust any Chinese listing?
The SEC launched investigations, but enforcement was complicated. Longtop’s executives were in China, beyond the easy reach of U.S. regulators. Chinese authorities, meanwhile, showed little interest in prosecuting what was largely seen as an embarrassment involving foreign investors.
Investors filed lawsuits in U.S. courts, but recovering losses proved nearly impossible. Unlike Enron or WorldCom, where domestic courts could seize assets, Longtop operated in a jurisdiction outside U.S. control. For many investors, the money was simply gone.
The Role of Banks and Gatekeepers
Longtop’s underwriters—Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank—faced criticism for failing to detect the fraud before bringing the company to market. Auditors, too, came under fire: How could Deloitte sign off on years of financial statements without spotting the fakery?
The answer lay partly in the difficulty of auditing in China. Access to bank records required cooperation from local officials, and management had ample opportunity to stage documents and restrict auditor access. Even Deloitte, one of the most respected firms in the world, only uncovered the fraud when it pushed harder during the 2011 audit.
The scandal underscored the vulnerabilities in cross-border auditing, where cultural, legal, and regulatory barriers create blind spots.
Collapse of Trust in U.S.-Listed Chinese Firms
Longtop’s cooked books were part of a wave of scandals that eroded trust in Chinese companies listed overseas. Between 2010 and 2012, firms like Sino-Forest, China MediaExpress, and Rino International faced fraud allegations.
The cumulative effect was devastating. Investors fled U.S.-listed Chinese stocks. The SEC and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) clashed with Chinese regulators over access to audit work papers. By 2013, the U.S. passed stricter listing requirements, and many Chinese companies voluntarily delisted to avoid scrutiny.
Longtop, once hailed as a poster child for China’s software industry, became the face of this mistrust.
The Human Dimension
For investors, especially pension funds and institutional buyers who had trusted Longtop’s numbers, the collapse meant billions in losses. Employees in China also suffered, as the company’s reputation was destroyed and legitimate operations shrank.
Founder Jia Xiao Gong largely disappeared from the public spotlight after the scandal, while foreign investors were left holding worthless shares. For ordinary Chinese employees, the scandal was another reminder of how corporate deception at the top could cost jobs and livelihoods at the bottom.
Lessons Learned
The Longtop scandal provides several enduring lessons for global markets:
-
Verification is Key
Independent confirmation of bank balances is essential. Longtop’s fake cash accounts should have been exposed earlier through more rigorous verification. -
Auditing Across Borders is Risky
Auditors face serious challenges when verifying information in jurisdictions with limited transparency. Investors must weigh this risk carefully. -
Prestige Does Not Equal Safety
Big banks and Big Four auditors cannot guarantee legitimacy. Longtop had Goldman Sachs, Deutsche Bank, and Deloitte on its side, yet it was a fraud. -
Regulatory Cooperation is Essential
U.S. regulators struggled to act because the company and its executives were in China. Cross-border enforcement remains a major gap in financial oversight. -
Skepticism is a Virtue
When companies report margins and growth that seem too good to be true, they often are. Investors must question outliers, especially in opaque markets.
Legacy of the Scandal
Today, Longtop Financial is remembered not for its software, but for its deception. The case accelerated efforts by U.S. regulators to demand greater transparency from foreign firms. It also fueled the debate over whether Chinese companies should be allowed to list in the U.S. without full access to their audit records.
In 2020, nearly a decade later, the U.S. passed the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act, requiring foreign firms to allow U.S. regulators access to audit inspections—or face delisting. The roots of that law can be traced directly to scandals like Longtop’s.
The scandal also reshaped investor behavior. Many funds grew wary of Chinese companies unless they had long operating histories, trusted partners, and greater transparency. While capital still flowed into China, the era of blind faith in “China growth stories” was over.
Conclusion
Longtop Financial’s cooked books were more than a corporate fraud. They represented a systemic failure in global finance: investors seduced by growth stories, banks eager for deals, auditors constrained by access issues, and regulators hamstrung by borders.
At its peak, Longtop was valued at over $2 billion. By the end, it was worth nothing. Its fall destroyed fortunes, tarnished reputations, and undermined confidence in U.S.-listed Chinese firms for years to come.
Like Enron, WorldCom, and Parmalat, Longtop is now taught as a case study in corporate fraud. Its lesson is stark but simple: glossy growth stories, prestigious auditors, and blue-chip underwriters cannot replace hard skepticism and independent verification. In global markets, trust is valuable—but once broken, it takes decades to rebuild.
ALSO READ: Kodak ignoring the digital camera revolution
