Private equity’s role in bankruptcies

Private equity (PE) firms are among the most powerful players in modern finance. They pool money from wealthy individuals, pension funds, and institutions to buy companies, restructure them, and eventually sell them for profit. Supporters argue PE firms improve efficiency and unlock value. Critics counter that their strategies often push companies into financial distress or outright bankruptcy.

Bankruptcies involving private equity ownership have become common in retail, healthcare, energy, and other industries. The debate is fierce: do PE firms rescue struggling businesses, or do they load them with debt and drain resources until they collapse?

This article explores how private equity works, why bankruptcies happen under PE ownership, notable case studies, and the broader economic and ethical debates.

How Private Equity Works

Private equity operates through buyouts:

1. Acquisition: A PE firm raises a fund from investors and uses it to buy a company, often through a leveraged buyout (LBO).

2. Leverage (Debt): Instead of paying entirely with equity, the PE firm borrows large sums. The acquired company—not the PE firm—bears this debt.

3. Restructuring: PE owners try to cut costs, sell assets, or change management to increase profitability.

4. Exit: After 5–7 years, the firm aims to sell the company, take it public, or merge it with another.

The reliance on debt is central. While leverage magnifies returns for PE investors, it also increases the risk of bankruptcy if the company cannot handle debt payments.

Why Private Equity-Backed Companies Go Bankrupt

1. Debt Overload

Leveraged buyouts saddle firms with debt. Servicing interest payments can consume cash flow, leaving little for reinvestment, innovation, or unexpected challenges.

2. Cost-Cutting Pressures

To boost short-term returns, PE owners often slash jobs, reduce benefits, and cut corners. This may weaken long-term competitiveness.

3. Asset Stripping

PE firms may sell valuable assets (real estate, patents, divisions) to generate cash. While this benefits investors, it can hollow out the company’s core strength.

4. Dividend Recapitalizations

Some PE owners borrow more money in the company’s name and pay themselves dividends. This leaves the company with higher debt and less resilience.

5. Industry Headwinds

Many bankruptcies happen in sectors already under pressure, like retail or energy. Critics argue PE accelerates the decline rather than reversing it.

Notable Case Studies

Toys “R” Us

• Acquired in 2005 by KKR, Bain Capital, and Vornado Realty through a $6.6 billion leveraged buyout.

• Saddled with $5 billion in debt, it struggled to compete with Amazon and Walmart.

• Declared bankruptcy in 2017, closing hundreds of stores and laying off 30,000 workers.

Payless ShoeSource

• Bought by Golden Gate Capital and Blum Capital in 2012.

• Filed for bankruptcy twice (2017 and 2019). Critics blamed debt burdens and underinvestment.

Caesars Entertainment

• Acquired in 2008 by Apollo Global Management and TPG in a $30 billion deal.

• Filed for bankruptcy in 2015, one of the largest in U.S. history, citing overwhelming debt.

Sears and J.Crew

• Both faced PE ownership strategies that increased debt and reduced flexibility.

• Ultimately filed for bankruptcy, emblematic of retail’s struggles under leveraged buyouts.

The Human Impact

Bankruptcies under PE ownership are not just financial stories—they affect workers, communities, and consumers.

• Job Losses: Mass layoffs often follow bankruptcies. Toys “R” Us, for example, left tens of thousands unemployed without severance.

• Pensions and Benefits: Debt restructuring may reduce or eliminate employee benefits.

• Communities: Store closures can devastate local economies.

• Consumers: Brand loyalty is destroyed when companies vanish from the market.

Defenses from Private Equity

Private equity firms argue their role is misunderstood:

1. Reviving Struggling Companies: Many buyouts target already weak businesses. Bankruptcy might have happened anyway.

2. Market Efficiency: By restructuring, PE firms reallocate resources from failing models to stronger ones.

3. Selective Failures: Not all PE deals end in bankruptcy; many are profitable and successful.

4. Shared Risk: Investors, not just PE firms, bear losses when bankruptcies happen.

Criticisms of Private Equity in Bankruptcies

Short-Term Profit vs. Long-Term Stability

Critics argue PE prioritizes quick returns at the expense of sustainable growth.

Misaligned Incentives

Because debt is carried by the company, PE firms can extract value even if the company fails later.

Systemic Risk

Large-scale bankruptcies can ripple through supply chains, lenders, and communities, amplifying economic instability.

Ethical Concerns

Dividend recapitalizations and asset stripping are seen as enriching investors while harming employees and creditors.

Regulatory and Policy Debates

Governments and regulators are increasingly scrutinizing private equity’s role in bankruptcies.

United States

• Carried Interest Loophole: PE managers benefit from favorable tax treatment. Critics argue this encourages excessive risk-taking.

• Proposed Reforms: Some lawmakers advocate restricting dividend recapitalizations or holding PE firms liable for bankruptcies.

Europe

• Stricter Oversight: EU regulators have considered rules limiting leverage in buyouts.

• Worker Protections: Stronger labor laws in Europe sometimes mitigate the harshest outcomes.

Global Context

• Emerging markets are also seeing PE deals, raising concerns about whether the bankruptcy risks will follow.

Academic and Expert Views

• Critical Studies: Research suggests PE-backed companies are more likely to go bankrupt than similar non-PE firms, especially in retail.

• Supportive Studies: Other work shows PE can improve productivity and competitiveness in some sectors.

• Balanced Views: The truth likely varies case by case—some bankruptcies reflect poor PE practices, others reflect broader industry decline.

Alternatives and Reform Ideas

1. Restrict Dividend Recaps: Limit the ability of PE owners to load companies with debt for shareholder payouts.

2. Shared Liability: Hold PE firms responsible for worker severance or pensions if their owned company collapses.

3. Transparency: Require PE firms to disclose more about debt structures and risks.

4. Encourage Long-Term Strategies: Incentives for PE firms that invest in innovation and growth, not just cost-cutting.

5. Strengthen Bankruptcy Laws: Ensure workers and small creditors are prioritized over financial investors.

Conclusion

Private equity’s role in bankruptcies is complex. On one hand, PE firms bring capital, expertise, and restructuring tools to struggling companies. On the other, their heavy reliance on debt, aggressive cost-cutting, and extraction of value often push firms toward collapse.

For workers, communities, and policymakers, the stakes are high. The debate boils down to this:

• Are PE firms rescuers that sometimes fail, or exploiters that too often profit from failure?

The truth may be a mix of both. What is clear is that bankruptcies under PE ownership raise urgent questions about fairness, accountability, and the balance between private profit and public cost.

As PE continues to grow worldwide, how governments, regulators, and society respond will determine whether private equity becomes a force for renewal—or a driver of destruction.

ALSO READ: Best Semiconductor Stocks in India 2025