The collapse of FTX in late 2022 shocked the financial world, wiping out billions in customer funds and shaking confidence in the cryptocurrency industry. But one of the most explosive elements of the saga wasn’t just the fraud—it was the political donations made by FTX executives, particularly founder Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF).
FTX wasn’t just a crypto exchange; it was also a political machine. Its leaders funneled tens of millions of dollars into U.S. elections, lobbying efforts, and policy campaigns. These donations have sparked fierce debates over campaign finance transparency, regulatory capture, and whether crypto money was being used to buy influence at the highest levels of government.
1. The Scale of Donations
Sam Bankman-Fried quickly rose to become one of the largest political donors in America:
- 2020 Election Cycle: Donated over $5 million to support Joe Biden’s presidential campaign, making him one of the top contributors.
- 2022 Midterms: Donated more than $40 million, mostly to Democratic candidates and political action committees (PACs).
- Overall: Estimates suggest FTX-linked executives collectively gave over $90 million in political donations.
This scale placed FTX alongside Wall Street firms and billionaire donors, raising alarms about the influence of crypto money in politics.
2. Allegations of Dark Money
While SBF was the public face of FTX’s political giving, court documents revealed:
- Nishad Singh (Head of Engineering): Contributed millions to Democratic causes.
- Ryan Salame (Co-CEO of FTX Digital Markets): Directed millions to Republican candidates.
- “Straw donations”: Prosecutors alleged executives used company funds routed through personal accounts to disguise the source of money.
If true, this violated campaign finance laws and masked the extent of FTX’s influence.
3. What FTX Wanted in Return
FTX’s political donations weren’t charity—they were strategic. The company sought:
- Regulatory influence: Shaping crypto policy in Washington, including favorable treatment for exchanges.
- Lobbying for legislation: Pushing the Digital Commodities Consumer Protection Act (DCCPA), seen by critics as pro-FTX.
- Image building: SBF crafted a public persona as a “philanthropic billionaire” supporting pandemic preparedness and progressive causes.
Donations bought FTX access to lawmakers, regulators, and the media.
4. The Fallout After Collapse
When FTX imploded in November 2022, political recipients scrambled to respond:
- Refunds & donations to charity: Many politicians returned FTX-linked funds or redirected them to charities.
- FEC scrutiny: The Federal Election Commission began investigating the legality of the donations.
- Bankruptcy estate demands: FTX’s new management demanded that recipients return political donations to help repay creditors.
The scandal tainted dozens of lawmakers across the political spectrum.
5. Sam Bankman-Fried’s Legal Trouble
Prosecutors charged SBF with multiple crimes, including campaign finance violations. Allegations included:
- Straw donor scheme: Using executives as conduits to skirt contribution limits.
- Misuse of customer funds: Donating money taken directly from FTX customer deposits.
- Deception: Publicly claiming to support bipartisan causes while secretly funneling money across the aisle.
These charges turned the political donation scandal into one of the most serious elements of the criminal case.
6. Bipartisan Reach
While SBF was most closely associated with Democrats, FTX money reached both sides:
- Democrats: Received the majority of donations, particularly through progressive PACs.
- Republicans: Received significant contributions via Ryan Salame and other executives.
- Bipartisan strategy: The goal was influence regardless of which party held power.
FTX’s bipartisan giving highlighted how crypto firms sought political cover on all fronts.
7. Criticism of Politicians
Lawmakers who accepted FTX donations faced backlash:
- Accusations of hypocrisy: Critics argued they accepted funds from a fraudster while claiming to protect consumers.
- Ethical questions: Did donations shape lawmakers’ willingness to scrutinize FTX before its collapse?
- Public anger: Many saw the donations as proof of a rigged system where money buys access.
Even after refunds, reputational damage lingered.
8. Broader Impact on Crypto Regulation
The controversy fueled suspicion of the entire crypto industry:
- Perception of corruption: Many now view crypto lobbying as inherently tainted.
- Regulatory crackdown: U.S. agencies have become more aggressive in pursuing exchanges post-FTX.
- Loss of trust: The idea that crypto money was “buying Washington” undermined legitimate industry voices.
FTX’s political spending may have set back crypto regulation for years.
9. The Philanthropy Angle
SBF also framed his donations as part of “effective altruism”—a philosophy of maximizing good through wealth. He pledged billions to pandemic prevention, climate initiatives, and global health.
But critics argue philanthropy was a smokescreen:
- Reputation laundering: Donating to noble causes while misusing customer funds.
- Buying credibility: Media and academics were less critical due to FTX’s financial support.
- Collapse of trust in EA movement: Effective altruism itself faced scrutiny for enabling SBF’s image.
The blending of philanthropy and politics amplified controversy.
10. Lessons from the FTX Donation Scandal
- Transparency matters: Campaign finance systems must detect hidden or straw donations.
- Crypto regulation needs independence: Laws cannot be shaped by firms under active investigation.
- Bipartisan capture is dangerous: Donations across parties dilute accountability.
- Public trust is fragile: Perceptions of corruption erode both political and crypto credibility.
The scandal highlights how unchecked money flows can destabilize both finance and democracy.
Conclusion
FTX’s political donation controversies revealed how crypto’s biggest players sought to buy influence at the highest levels of government. By funneling tens of millions into U.S. politics, often using questionable or illegal methods, FTX not only corrupted the policy process but also undermined trust in the entire industry.
For Washington, the scandal was a wake-up call about the risks of accepting money from unregulated financial empires. For crypto, it was proof that transparency and accountability are non-negotiable if the industry wants legitimacy.
The collapse of FTX wasn’t just financial—it was political. And its ripple effects on regulation, campaign finance, and public trust will linger long after the exchange itself is gone.
ALSO READ: NFT royalties enforcement debates
