How mutual funds lobby for favorable regulations

Mutual funds are promoted as investor-first vehicles—safe, transparent, and regulated to protect small savers. But the industry is also a powerful business, managing trillions of rupees and generating hefty management fees for Asset Management Companies (AMCs).

Behind the scenes, fund houses and their industry associations often lobby regulators and governments to influence the rules of the game. While lobbying isn’t inherently illegal, it frequently prioritizes AMC profitability over investor protection, shaping everything from disclosure norms to taxation rules.

This article explores how mutual funds lobby for favorable regulations, the methods they use, key case studies, and the risks for retail investors.

Why Mutual Funds Lobby

1. Protecting Fee Streams
   AMCs lobby to prevent aggressive caps on expense ratios or distributor commissions.

2. Shaping Taxation
   Preferential tax treatment of equity funds (long-term capital gains) is defended vigorously.

3. Easing Compliance Burdens
   AMCs push back against stringent disclosure and valuation rules that could hurt reported performance.

4. Expanding Product Scope
   Lobbying helps funds introduce exotic products (international funds, REITs, derivatives-linked schemes) with looser rules.

5. Crisis Management
   During market meltdowns, AMCs lobby for liquidity support, regulatory forbearance, or bailout mechanisms.

Methods of Lobbying

1. Industry Associations as Fronts

• In India, the Association of Mutual Funds in India (AMFI) acts as the industry’s collective voice.

• In the U.S., groups like the Investment Company Institute (ICI) play a similar role.

• These associations formally lobby regulators (SEBI, RBI, Finance Ministry) for favorable norms.

2. “Investor Education” Campaigns

• Framed as awareness drives, these campaigns often shape narratives that align with AMC interests (e.g., “Mutual Funds Sahi Hai”).

3. Policy Committees & Advisory Roles

• AMC executives frequently sit on SEBI working groups and advisory committees, influencing rules from inside.

4. Political Donations & Networks

• AMC parent companies (often banks or conglomerates) donate via electoral bonds or lobbying channels, indirectly supporting their fund arms.

5. Crisis-Time Bargaining

• In liquidity crises, AMCs push regulators for special liquidity windows or relaxed redemption norms.

Case Studies

1. Expense Ratio Debate (India, 2018–19)

• SEBI capped expense ratios to protect investors from high fees.

• AMCs, through AMFI, lobbied aggressively against deep cuts.

• The final rules were watered down compared to initial proposals, showing the industry’s influence.

2. Debt Fund Valuation (India, Post-IL&FS 2018)

• After defaults, SEBI wanted stricter “mark-to-market” rules.

• Fund houses lobbied for leeway, arguing sudden markdowns would trigger panic.

• The result: phased implementation, delaying full transparency.

3. U.S. Money Market Funds (Post-2008)

• Regulators wanted floating NAVs and stricter liquidity norms after the Reserve Primary Fund collapsed.

• The ICI lobbied intensely, delaying reforms for years.

• Even when rules changed, they were diluted from original proposals.

4. Franklin Templeton Crisis (2020, India)

• After Franklin shut six debt funds, SEBI considered tighter norms for credit-risk funds.

• Industry lobbying emphasized “don’t stifle innovation,” softening immediate crackdowns.

Why Lobbying Works

1. AMCs as “Too Important to Ignore”
   Regulators know mutual funds are central to capital markets. If funds suffer, markets wobble.

2. Information Advantage
   AMCs argue they have technical expertise regulators lack, giving them influence over rule-writing.

3. Political Economy of Jobs & Growth
   Governments see mutual funds as vehicles for household savings mobilization. That gives the industry bargaining power.

Risks for Retail Investors

1. Weaker Protections
   Diluted disclosure or valuation rules mean investors remain blind to real risks.

2. Higher Costs
   Successful lobbying often preserves higher expense ratios, cutting into long-term returns.

3. Moral Hazard
   Bailouts for AMCs during crises encourage reckless risk-taking, as losses can be socialized.

4. Erosion of Trust
   When investors sense rules are written for fund houses—not them—it undermines confidence in the industry.

Ethical Reflection

Lobbying per se is not illegal—every industry advocates for its interests. But when mutual funds, custodians of retail savings, lobby for rules that dilute transparency, protect fees, or hide risks, it raises a fundamental ethical issue: Are AMCs serving investors or themselves?

The fiduciary principle demands that AMCs act for investors first. Yet lobbying often flips that priority.

How Investors Can Protect Themselves

1. Stay Informed
   Track SEBI circulars and AMFI announcements to understand when lobbying shapes outcomes.

2. Be Skeptical of Narratives
   “Investor education” ads may also be self-serving industry propaganda.

3. Diversify Across Categories
   Spread savings across equity, debt, ETFs, and international funds to reduce exposure to industry-level lobbying risks.

4. Support Investor Associations
   Investor advocacy groups can balance AMC lobbying by voicing retail concerns.

Conclusion

Mutual funds don’t just operate under regulations—they actively shape them. Through associations, committees, and political influence, AMCs lobby for rules that often protect their business interests while leaving investors more exposed.

For regulators, the challenge is to listen without being captured. For AMCs, the duty is to align lobbying with true investor protection, not just profitability. And for investors, the lesson is simple: don’t assume the rules were written with you in mind—sometimes, they were written to keep AMCs comfortable.

Because in the world of mutual funds, the loudest voices in regulation aren’t investors—they’re the fund houses lobbying behind closed doors.

ALSO READ: The hidden hand of investment banks in shaping U.S. elections