Binance and U.S. SEC lawsuits

Few companies have shaped the cryptocurrency industry as much as Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange by trading volume. Founded in 2017 by Changpeng “CZ” Zhao, Binance grew from a startup to a global powerhouse in just a few years, offering millions of users access to trading, staking, lending, and other crypto services.

But its meteoric rise has drawn intense scrutiny from regulators—most notably the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In 2023, the SEC filed sweeping lawsuits against Binance and CZ, alleging violations of securities laws, mishandling of customer funds, and deliberate attempts to evade U.S. oversight. These cases have become a flashpoint in the global debate over crypto regulation, with implications not just for Binance, but for the future of the entire digital asset industry.

1. Binance’s Global Rise

Binance’s success stemmed from several factors:

Aggressive Expansion: Quickly listed new tokens and launched innovative products.
Global Strategy: Relocated headquarters multiple times, avoiding strict jurisdictions.
Ecosystem Growth: Created Binance Smart Chain (now BNB Chain), supporting DeFi and NFT projects.
Retail Access: Provided user-friendly apps and low fees that attracted millions of retail traders.

By 2021, Binance was processing more trading volume than its top competitors combined. But this dominance came at a price: regulators accused Binance of operating outside compliance frameworks in key markets, including the U.S.

2. The SEC’s Allegations

In June 2023, the SEC filed a lawsuit against Binance and CZ, outlining several charges:

Operating Unregistered Securities Exchange:
- The SEC argued that Binance allowed U.S. customers to trade crypto tokens that qualify as securities without registering.
- Assets like BNB, BUSD (Binance’s stablecoin), and certain staking programs were cited.
Commingling Customer and Corporate Funds:
- The SEC alleged Binance improperly mixed user funds with company funds, drawing comparisons to the FTX collapse.
Deceptive Practices:
- Binance was accused of misleading investors about trading controls and market surveillance.
- The SEC claimed Binance allowed high-value U.S. customers to bypass restrictions through backdoor arrangements.
Failure to Register as a Broker/Dealer:
- Binance allegedly acted as an unlicensed broker, clearing agency, and exchange simultaneously.

These allegations reflected the SEC’s broader stance: most crypto tokens are securities, and exchanges must comply with securities law.

3. Other U.S. Legal Pressures

The SEC lawsuit wasn’t the only battle Binance faced in the U.S.:

CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission) Lawsuit: Earlier in 2023, the CFTC accused Binance of illegally offering derivatives products to U.S. customers without registration.
DOJ Investigations: The Department of Justice probed Binance over potential money laundering and sanctions violations.
State Regulators: Some U.S. states took independent actions against Binance’s operations.

Together, these actions painted Binance as a company under siege from multiple U.S. agencies.

4. Binance’s Defense

Binance denied wrongdoing and issued strong rebuttals:

Jurisdiction Argument: Binance claimed it is not a U.S. exchange, with Binance.US operating separately.
Customer Fund Safety: The company argued no evidence showed misuse of customer funds.
Regulatory Overreach: Binance accused the SEC of pursuing “regulation by enforcement” instead of creating clear rules.
Commitment to Compliance: Pointed to efforts such as KYC/AML requirements and hiring compliance officers.

CZ also emphasized that Binance’s international operations were strong, portraying the U.S. legal actions as politically motivated.

5. Implications for Binance Users

For users, the lawsuits created uncertainty:

Service Restrictions: Binance delisted certain tokens and adjusted offerings for U.S. customers.
Liquidity Concerns: Traders worried lawsuits could reduce liquidity or force Binance to retreat from the U.S.
Market Sentiment: News of lawsuits triggered sell-offs in BNB and broader crypto markets.

While Binance insisted user funds were safe, echoes of the FTX collapse left many cautious.

6. Broader Market Impact

The Binance-SEC battle reverberated across the crypto industry:

Token Classification: Tokens cited by the SEC as securities faced delistings on other exchanges.
Investor Confidence: Lawsuits fueled fears of further crackdowns on exchanges.
Competitive Shifts: Coinbase and other rivals faced similar lawsuits, but Binance bore the brunt as the largest player.
Stablecoin Uncertainty: The SEC’s targeting of BUSD raised questions about the future of stablecoins in the U.S.

The lawsuits underscored the systemic importance of exchanges in crypto markets.

7. Global Regulatory Reactions

Outside the U.S., regulators also scrutinized Binance:

Europe: Under the EU’s MiCA regulation, Binance faces stricter requirements for licensing and stablecoin issuance.
UK: The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) barred Binance from operating without proper approval.
Asia: Japan and Singapore forced Binance to adjust or halt operations for non-compliance.

Binance responded by applying for licenses in more jurisdictions, signaling a pivot toward compliance-driven operations.

8. The Debate: Enforcement vs. Innovation

The Binance lawsuits epitomize the tension between innovation and regulation:

Pro-SEC View: Without rules, exchanges can exploit retail investors, enable fraud, and threaten financial stability.
Pro-Binance View: Heavy-handed enforcement stifles innovation, drives business offshore, and punishes users instead of providing clarity.

This debate reflects broader questions about crypto’s future: Will regulation integrate digital assets into mainstream finance, or push them into shadow markets?

9. Possible Outcomes

Several scenarios could unfold:

Settlement: Binance pays fines, agrees to compliance reforms, and continues operating globally.
Separation: Binance.US becomes fully independent, with stricter oversight.
Retreat: Binance reduces or exits U.S. operations to focus on friendlier jurisdictions.
Severe Penalties: If allegations of fund commingling are proven, penalties could mirror FTX-like consequences, though Binance insists it’s solvent.

The outcome will shape not just Binance’s future, but also regulatory precedents for the entire industry.

10. Timeline of Key Events

2017: Binance founded in China, relocates due to regulatory pressure.
2019: Binance launches Binance.US to comply with U.S. regulations.
2020–2021: Binance expands globally, faces warnings from regulators in UK, Japan, and others.
2022: FTX collapse intensifies scrutiny of all exchanges.
March 2023: CFTC sues Binance for offering unregistered derivatives.
June 2023: SEC files sweeping lawsuit against Binance and CZ.
Late 2023–2024: Binance adjusts global strategy, faces fines and settlements in some jurisdictions.

Conclusion

The lawsuits against Binance mark a watershed moment for crypto regulation. As the largest exchange in the world, Binance’s fate is intertwined with the industry’s trajectory. A settlement could bring clarity and stability; a severe penalty could spark chaos and accelerate regulatory crackdowns.

For regulators, the case is about asserting authority and protecting investors. For Binance, it is about survival, reputation, and adapting to a new regulatory era. For the broader crypto industry, it is a reminder that the days of “move fast and break things” are over—the battle for legitimacy is here.

The question is no longer whether crypto will be regulated, but how—and at what cost.

ALSO READ: Was the 2008 crisis a planned wealth transfer?