For decades, banks have been the most trusted custodians of household savings. Customers rely on them not just for deposits and loans but increasingly for investments. In recent years, Systematic Investment Plans (SIPs) have become a key product that banks promote aggressively.
On paper, SIPs empower retail investors to build wealth. In practice, however, a disturbing trend has emerged: banks auto-starting SIPs for customers without full or informed consent.
What begins as a simple account update or casual inquiry can end with unsuspecting customers discovering that monthly deductions are being made toward SIPs they never clearly approved. This silent enrollment practice has triggered complaints, regulatory scrutiny, and loss of trust.
This article investigates how banks auto-start SIPs without proper consent, why it happens, and what it means for investors.
How Auto-SIPs Are Set in Motion
1. “Pre-Ticked” Consent Forms
When customers sign general service forms (for debit cards, internet banking, or insurance), hidden pre-ticked boxes authorize SIP enrollment.
2. Verbal “Yes” as Formal Approval
Relationship managers (RMs) casually pitch SIPs during routine visits. A verbal nod is recorded as consent, even if no written authorization is provided.
3. Bundled Account Packages
New salary or pension accounts are often bundled with “complimentary” investment plans. Customers discover deductions later.
4. Digital Traps
Banking apps prompt customers to “try wealth-building” with a one-click default SIP, activated without detailed disclosure.
5. Cross-Selling Incentives
RMs under sales pressure tag routine service calls as “investment advice” sessions and start SIPs on behalf of customers.
Why Banks Do It
- Target Pressure
RMs are measured not only on deposits or loans but also on SIP sign-ups. - Commission Gains
Banks earn distributor commissions from AMCs for every SIP registered. - Asset Growth
Auto-starting SIPs boosts reported AUM inflows, pleasing regulators and shareholders. - Customer Inertia
Many customers don’t notice small deductions or hesitate to complain, allowing auto-SIPs to continue.
The Investor Experience
Case 1: The Pensioner’s Surprise
A retiree in Chennai opened a pension account. Two months later, he noticed ₹2,000 monthly deductions for a SIP he never authorized. Bank staff insisted he had “signed” during account opening.
Case 2: The Corporate Employee Trap
A young professional in Bengaluru was pitched a “salary account benefit package.” Without explicit consent, a ₹3,000 SIP was started. He only discovered it when he needed funds urgently and saw NAV-linked deductions.
Case 3: The App Click
A customer in Mumbai tapped “Yes” on a banking app prompt to “explore wealth.” Without clear instructions, an equity SIP mandate was triggered.
The Risks for Investors
- Misaligned Goals
Auto-SIPs may be linked to aggressive funds unsuited for the investor’s profile. - Liquidity Strain
Unexpected deductions disrupt cash flow, especially for pensioners or salaried employees with tight budgets. - Unrealized Risk
Investors assume they are in safe deposits; instead, they are exposed to volatile equity markets. - Tax Complications
Unplanned SIP redemptions can create short-term tax liabilities. - Trust Erosion
Discovering hidden deductions damages faith in both banks and SIPs.
The Bank Playbook
- Language Manipulation: Words like “complimentary,” “value-added,” or “default wealth option” mislead customers into assuming no risks.
- Silence = Consent: If customers don’t object within a few days, enrollment continues.
- Low Visibility: Deductions are buried in account statements, rarely highlighted.
- Delay in Cancellation: Even after discovering, investors face long delays to stop auto-SIPs.
Why Investors Rarely Protest
- Low Ticket Size
Many auto-SIPs start with ₹500–₹1,000, amounts too small for legal disputes. - Financial Illiteracy
Customers don’t understand SIPs or are embarrassed to admit confusion. - Trust Bias
People hesitate to accuse banks of mis-selling. - Cancellation Hassles
Stopping auto-SIPs requires multiple branch visits, discouraging complaints.
Global Parallels
- U.S. Bank Investment Accounts: Auto-enrollments into managed accounts triggered lawsuits for unauthorized trades.
- UK PPI Scandal: Banks sold payment protection insurance without explicit consent, costing billions in fines.
- China’s Wealth Apps: Retail savers were nudged into high-risk products by default clicks.
Auto-SIP practices in India mirror a wider global pattern of financial institutions exploiting inertia.
The Human Cost
- Retirees: Lost faith in banks after seeing retirement money siphoned into equity markets.
- Young Professionals: Distracted from financial planning after bad first experiences.
- Rural Customers: Faced deductions they couldn’t even explain, fueling distrust of formal banking.
The Industry’s Defense
Banks often claim:
- “We act with customer consent” — pointing to pre-ticked boxes or vague signatures.
- “SIPs are good for customers” — using long-term benefits as justification.
- “Mistakes are rare” — framing complaints as isolated cases.
But systemic patterns suggest otherwise.
Warning Signs for Customers
- Hidden investment options in account-opening forms.
- Relationship managers pushing “packages.”
- Deductions appearing with unfamiliar AMC names.
- App notifications encouraging “wealth upgrades.”
- Difficulty in getting clear answers about mandates.
What Regulators Should Do
- Ban Pre-Ticked Boxes
Explicit opt-in only; silence cannot equal consent. - Mandate Digital Consent Trails
SIPs must require OTP or digital signature confirmation. - Audit Bank Sales Practices
Regulators should inspect cross-selling scripts and incentives. - Grievance Redressal
Fast-track complaint systems to reverse unauthorized deductions. - Public Disclosure
Banks with high SIP mis-selling complaints should be publicly flagged.
How Investors Can Protect Themselves
- Scrutinize Forms
Never sign documents without reading all sections. - Check Statements Regularly
Spot deductions early before they accumulate. - Avoid Bundled Accounts
Decline “packages” that include hidden investment options. - Escalate Immediately
File written complaints with the bank and SEBI if SIPs start without approval. - Use Direct Plans
Invest through AMC websites or trusted fintech platforms rather than bank bundles.
Could Auto-SIPs Spark a Larger Scandal?
Yes. If widespread evidence of auto-SIPs emerges, it could trigger a scandal similar to the UK’s PPI mis-selling debacle. Banks may face regulatory fines, reputational damage, and class-action lawsuits.
Conclusion
SIPs are meant to empower investors through discipline and transparency. But when banks auto-start SIPs without full consent, they betray customer trust and taint the credibility of mutual funds.
The lesson is stark: discipline cannot be forced. Auto-enrollment may serve bank targets, but it undermines the very essence of financial choice.
Until regulators enforce strict consent protocols and customers remain vigilant, auto-SIP scams will remain a silent drain on household finances.
ALSO READ: How Credit Rating Shopping Really Works
