Systematic Investment Plans (SIPs) are sold as the most disciplined and reliable way to invest in mutual funds. Their popularity owes much to agents and distributors — the people who pitch them, often face-to-face, to first-time investors.
But in a fiercely competitive market, not every agent plays fair. To win trust and commissions, some resort to a deceptive tactic: faking their own SIP returns. They show doctored statements, cherry-picked screenshots, or exaggerated figures to convince clients that SIPs have made them rich, and that the same future awaits new investors.
This practice not only misleads clients but also undermines trust in the entire SIP ecosystem. In this article, we investigate how agents fake their own SIP returns, why investors believe them, and how to protect yourself from falling for this trap.
Why Agents Fake Returns
- Commission-Driven Model
Agents earn trail commissions as long as SIPs remain active. More clients = more revenue. - Trust as Currency
Investors are more likely to buy if they believe the agent has personally profited from the product. - High Competition
With banks, fintech apps, and independent distributors all selling SIPs, agents feel pressured to stand out. - Investor Insecurity
First-time investors want reassurance. Seeing an agent’s “successful” portfolio creates confidence.
The Tricks Agents Use
1. Doctored Screenshots
Agents show WhatsApp or PDF screenshots of “their portfolio” — edited to inflate returns or hide losses. Free editing tools make this easy.
2. Cherry-Picked Accounts
Instead of showing their actual portfolio, agents display only one small SIP that performed well, pretending it represents their entire investments.
3. Forwarded “Success Stories”
Agents circulate screenshots or case studies from others, passing them off as their own. Clients assume authenticity because the data looks official.
4. Backdated Entries
Some claim they invested since 2000s, showing charts of what a ₹5,000 SIP would have grown into — without admitting it’s hypothetical.
5. Mixing Insurance and SIPs
ULIPs or hybrid products are shown as “SIPs with insurance” returns, blurring lines between genuine SIPs and expensive policies.
6. Partial Disclosure
Loss-making funds or periods are hidden. Only outperforming funds are highlighted as “my SIPs.”
Why Clients Believe the Lies
- Authority Bias
Agents present themselves as “financial advisors,” and clients assume honesty. - Proof Bias
Screenshots look like hard evidence, even if fabricated. - Aspirational Pull
Seeing someone “just like them” succeed convinces investors it’s achievable. - Community Trust
In smaller towns, agents are neighbors or relatives, making clients less skeptical. - Financial Illiteracy
Most investors can’t distinguish between real SIP statements and edited ones.
Case Studies
Case 1: The Retired Teacher
A teacher in Jaipur trusted her local agent who showed “proof” of doubling money in five years. In reality, the screenshots were doctored. She invested ₹10 lakhs in SIPs beyond her risk appetite, only to face volatility and losses.
Case 2: The WhatsApp Portfolio Scam
In Bengaluru, young professionals in tech circles were convinced by WhatsApp images of SIP returns “earned” by their agent. Later, they discovered the images were widely circulated templates among distributors.
Case 3: The ULIP Masquerade
In Lucknow, an agent showcased high “SIP” returns that turned out to be from a Unit Linked Insurance Plan, not a mutual fund. Clients were locked into long contracts with high costs.
The Consequences for Investors
- Overconfidence
Believing SIPs deliver smooth, guaranteed profits, investors commit more than they can afford. - Panic in Downturns
When reality diverges — with negative returns — investors feel cheated and often redeem at losses. - Goal Disruption
Education, retirement, or housing goals suffer because expectations were set too high. - Distrust
Discovering fraud makes investors wary of legitimate mutual funds.
The Industry’s Role
- AMC Silence: Asset Management Companies rarely challenge fake marketing, as SIP inflows help their AUM grow.
- Loose Distributor Oversight: SEBI requires registration, but ground-level monitoring is weak.
- Commission Incentives: As long as revenue flows, distributors face little scrutiny for deceptive pitches.
Global Parallels
- U.S. Insurance Agents: Fake “personal returns” from annuities were used to lure retirees.
- UK Unit Trust Sellers: Promised past returns as if they were guaranteed future outcomes.
- Asia’s MLM Scams: Agents show fabricated returns as proof of legitimacy, trapping communities.
The SIP fake-return tactic is part of a wider global pattern of financial mis-selling.
Warning Signs for Investors
- Screenshots or statements shown on WhatsApp instead of official AMC portals.
- Claims of “guaranteed” returns or risk-free profits.
- Stories that sound too perfect — doubling money in 5 years.
- Mixing SIPs with insurance products under one “portfolio.”
- Reluctance to show verifiable AMC or registrar login access.
What Regulators Should Do
- Ban Use of Personal Portfolios in Sales
Agents should not present their own (or fake) investments as sales pitches. - Audit Trail Enforcement
SEBI should mandate that all sales material be approved by AMCs, not left to agents. - Penalties for Misrepresentation
Heavy fines and license suspensions for agents caught faking returns. - Public Education Drives
Campaigns highlighting that screenshots are not proof. - AMC Accountability
Fund houses must monitor distributor practices more actively.
How Investors Can Protect Themselves
- Verify Independently
Always check SIP performance directly on AMC or registrar portals. - Ignore Anecdotes
An agent’s personal “success story” is irrelevant to your goals. - Focus on Facts
Look at rolling returns, benchmarks, and fund consistency. - Beware of Guarantees
SIPs are market-linked; anyone promising certainty is lying. - Use Trusted Platforms
Consider direct plans through AMC websites or regulated fintech apps.
Could This Backfire on the Industry?
Yes. If investors widely discover that SIP agents use fake returns to lure clients, it could erode trust in the mutual fund industry. What was once seen as the most transparent investment tool could be tainted by perceptions of fraud and manipulation.
Conclusion
SIPs are meant to be transparent, regulated, and disciplined tools for wealth creation. But when agents fake their own returns to lure clients, the system’s credibility suffers.
The lie works because it blends two powerful forces: investor aspiration and misplaced trust. A doctored screenshot may seem harmless, but it can push families into risky, unsuitable investments with devastating consequences.
The responsibility lies with both regulators and investors. Regulators must clamp down on deceptive practices, while investors must verify information independently.
The golden rule remains: your financial decisions should never be based on someone else’s (real or fake) returns.
ALSO READ: The corporate bond fraud worth billions
