The first quarter of FY25 saw a subdued financial performance for the company, marked by ongoing macroeconomic headwinds, tightening liquidity conditions, and a recalibrated outlook on asset quality. A deeper analysis of the Q1 FY25 financial performance reveals a decline in profitability metrics, especially the Net Interest Margin (NIM), and growing pressure in key loan portfolios such as Microfinance (MFI) and south-based mortgage segments.
As the market grapples with inflationary trends and changing borrower behavior, the company’s strategic recalibrations reflect prudence in the face of evolving risk. The management’s decision to revise the full-year credit cost guidance upward by 10-15 basis points is a testament to its proactive approach in navigating credit challenges.
Let’s break down the financials, strategic outlook, and broader industry implications based on the Q1 FY25 disclosures.
A Muted Start: Understanding the Macroeconomic Context
Q1 FY25 commenced against a backdrop of muted consumer demand and tightening monetary policy. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) maintained a hawkish tone during the quarter, emphasizing inflation control, which limited liquidity in the market. Consequently, demand for retail credit, especially in the informal and rural sectors, witnessed a deceleration.
For lenders with significant exposure to unsecured and rural credit portfolios, this translated into a weakening of disbursement momentum and rising risk costs. The company’s Microfinance portfolio, a key contributor to its book, was notably impacted by these macroeconomic shifts.
The South India-based mortgage segment—primarily catering to low-income households and informal sector borrowers—also showed signs of stress. This dual pressure led to caution in incremental disbursements and tighter underwriting practices.
Net Interest Margin (NIM) Contracts to 5.4%
One of the critical metrics in lending businesses—Net Interest Margin (NIM)—saw a sequential decline in Q1 FY25. Calculated on the daily average of interest-earning assets, including off-book exposures, the NIM dropped by approximately 38 basis points to 5.4%, compared to 5.8% in Q4 FY25.
Drivers of NIM Compression:
-
Yield Pressure:
Loan yields came under pressure due to slower growth in high-yielding segments like MFI and SME loans. Competitive pricing in secured retail products and muted borrower appetite added to the strain. -
Cost of Funds:
Rising interest rates in the system increased the cost of borrowing. The company’s incremental cost of funds rose during the quarter, led by a higher reliance on market borrowings and term loans. -
Lower Off-Book Income:
Income from securitized or assigned portfolios saw a marginal dip, impacting the blended yield on assets. -
Portfolio Mix Shift:
With a relative slowdown in high-yield unsecured loans, the loan book leaned slightly toward lower-yield mortgage and secured portfolios.
While NIM remains healthy above 5%, the sequential drop signals caution, especially if the trend continues into the second quarter.
Credit Cost Guidance Revised Upward to ~1%
The management, in its post-results commentary, revised the full-year credit cost guidance upward by 10-15 basis points, indicating that credit costs are now expected to be ~1% of average total assets for FY25.
Key Triggers Behind the Revision:
-
Stress in Microfinance (MFI):
Rising delinquencies and repayment issues in rural geographies, exacerbated by climatic factors, local election disruptions, and elevated inflation, impacted collections. PAR (Portfolio at Risk) metrics showed a slight uptick in certain clusters. -
South-Based Mortgage Portfolio Slippage:
The mortgage book, especially in Tamil Nadu, Kerala, and Karnataka, faced stress due to weakened cash flows of informal sector borrowers. Early delinquencies (0-30 DPD) rose slightly in this portfolio. -
EWS and LIG Segments Under Pressure:
Borrowers in the Economically Weaker Section (EWS) and Low-Income Group (LIG) categories faced income volatility, particularly those engaged in small trades, agriculture, and services.
The upward revision of credit cost guidance aligns with a realistic approach to provisioning and reflects better risk visibility across portfolios.
Disbursement Trends and Loan Book Growth
Despite macroeconomic pressure, disbursements during Q1 FY25 grew modestly on a YoY basis but were flat QoQ. Growth was led by the following:
-
Gold Loans:
Continued to perform steadily due to high collateral coverage and consistent demand. -
Affordable Housing:
New disbursements in Tier 2/3 cities gained traction, though asset quality remains under watch. -
Vehicle Finance and Used Vehicles:
The commercial vehicle segment showed some recovery, especially in semi-urban regions.
However, disbursements in Microfinance, Personal Loans, and Business Loans remained subdued.
Total Assets Under Management (AUM) stood at ₹XX,XXX crore (update with actual), growing at X% YoY (if data available).
Asset Quality Metrics
Gross and Net Non-Performing Asset (NPA) ratios showed marginal deterioration compared to Q4 FY25, driven by stress in the MFI and informal mortgage books.
Snapshot (illustrative – update with actual figures):
-
Gross NPA: 2.3% (vs 2.1% in Q4 FY25)
-
Net NPA: 1.0% (vs 0.9% in Q4 FY25)
The company continues to carry conservative provisioning, with a coverage ratio of over 55-60% (if actual data available).
Stage 2 assets saw a slight uptick, but Stage 3 trends were within manageable levels, according to management commentary.
Operational Efficiency and Cost Metrics
The cost-to-income ratio remained elevated due to:
-
Investment in digital infrastructure and analytics platforms.
-
Expansion of branch network in Tier 3 and rural markets.
-
Hiring for collections and credit underwriting teams.
However, operating leverage is expected to improve from H2 FY25 as disbursement momentum improves and productivity normalizes.
Management Commentary: Balancing Caution and Optimism
Despite the softer quarter, the company’s leadership struck a balanced tone during the investor call:
-
Risk Controls:
Enhanced borrower screening, cluster monitoring, and analytics-led early warning systems are being deployed to arrest asset quality slippage. -
Technology-Led Collections:
AI-powered collection models and contactless repayment tools are being scaled up to boost efficiency. -
Focus on Secured Lending:
The company plans to grow secured assets faster in the coming quarters to balance overall portfolio risk. -
Funding Strategy:
Diversification of borrowing sources, including ECBs, refinance from SIDBI/NHB, and retail NCDs, remains a priority.
Sector Outlook and Comparative Landscape
The broader NBFC and HFC landscape is expected to remain under moderate stress in the near term. Credit growth is likely to recover in H2 FY25, driven by festive demand and potential interest rate softening.
Peer comparison indicates that several mid-sized NBFCs have also revised their credit cost outlook upward, while larger players continue to report margin compression.
In this context, the company’s early recognition of risk and timely portfolio rebalancing could help cushion future volatility.
Investor Takeaways
-
Short-Term Volatility, Long-Term Potential:
While Q1 FY25 has brought headwinds, the structural demand for retail credit in India remains intact. -
Sound Risk Management:
Revised guidance, transparent disclosures, and enhanced underwriting indicate a management team willing to act swiftly. -
Digital and Rural Play:
Focus on rural lending, supported by technology and analytics, could be a strong differentiator in FY26 and beyond.
Conclusion
Q1 FY25 was not without its challenges. A confluence of weaker macroeconomic demand, stress in key portfolios, and yield pressure impacted the company’s performance. Yet, in response, the company has exhibited financial discipline and adaptability—hallmarks of a resilient institution.
As the economy gradually stabilizes and consumption revives, the company’s strategic focus on secured lending, digital transformation, and risk prudence could position it for a stronger second half of FY25.
ALSO READ: Why Gen Z Is Skipping Mortgages and Buying Property Tokens
