Tether’s undisclosed banking relationships

Tether (USDT), the world’s most widely used stablecoin, plays a critical role in the global crypto ecosystem. Pegged to the U.S. dollar, it serves as the primary liquidity vehicle on major exchanges, often acting as the bridge between traditional finance and digital assets. With more than $110 billion in circulation as of 2025, it dwarfs competitors like USD Coin (USDC) and Binance’s BUSD.

But behind its dominance lies one of the most controversial aspects of the company: its undisclosed banking relationships. For years, Tether Ltd. (operated by iFinex, the parent of crypto exchange Bitfinex) has faced accusations of opaque reserves, questionable partners, and shifting banks across jurisdictions. This lack of transparency has raised alarms among regulators, skeptics, and even traditional financial institutions.

This article explores the murky world of Tether’s banking ties—its history, controversies, legal settlements, and what they mean for the broader financial system.

1. Why Tether’s Banking Matters

Stablecoins are only as strong as the assets backing them. If users doubt the reserves, the peg can collapse—causing contagion across crypto markets.

Unlike USDC, which openly discloses its reserves and U.S. banking partners like BNY Mellon and BlackRock-managed funds, Tether has historically:

• Refused to name banks publicly.

• Relied on offshore jurisdictions and smaller banks.

• Moved funds frequently to avoid regulatory shutdowns.

This secrecy has fueled speculation that Tether’s reserves may be less secure than claimed.

2. Early Struggles: No Banking Home (2014–2017)

When Tether launched in 2014, few banks wanted to serve crypto companies. Tether’s ties to Bitfinex made things worse, given Bitfinex’s history of regulatory disputes.

• 2015–2016: Tether reportedly banked with Taiwanese institutions that routed dollar transactions through Wells Fargo.

• 2017: Wells Fargo cut off correspondent services, leaving Tether scrambling for alternatives. Lawsuits ensued, but Tether eventually dropped its case.

During this period, users began to question whether USDT was fully backed.

3. Noble Bank and the Puerto Rico Episode

In 2017–2018, reports suggested Tether banked with Noble Bank International in Puerto Rico. Noble was a small, crypto-friendly bank that counted other digital asset firms as clients.

However, by 2018, Noble collapsed under financial strain. Tether again needed a new home.

• Critics noted that Tether’s frequent moves created systemic risk.

• Some speculated that Puerto Rico’s unusually high banking inflows were tied to Tether reserves.

This episode highlighted the fragility of crypto banking—when one institution falters, billions of dollars are at risk.

4. Deltec Bank in the Bahamas

By late 2018, Tether announced a new relationship with Deltec Bank & Trust, a Bahamas-based institution. A letter from Deltec (later criticized for vagueness) claimed that Tether’s reserves were intact.

Key issues:

• Deltec was a small bank compared to major global players.

• Questions emerged about whether Deltec could handle the scale of Tether’s operations.

• Deltec’s connections to other controversial crypto projects deepened skepticism.

Even with Deltec, Tether rarely confirmed details about custody arrangements, audits, or specific banking structures.

5. The Role of Shadow Banking and Intermediaries

Investigations revealed that Tether and Bitfinex sometimes relied on third-party payment processors and shell companies to move money.

• Crypto Capital Corp (Panama): Handled transactions for Bitfinex until 2018, when $850 million of its funds were seized by authorities. This led to a liquidity crisis, forcing Bitfinex to borrow from Tether reserves.

• Other Intermediaries: Multiple small entities across Asia, Eastern Europe, and the Caribbean reportedly helped move Tether funds.

These relationships exposed Tether to fraud, regulatory seizures, and reputational damage.

6. Regulatory Crackdowns and Settlements

Tether’s opaque banking relationships eventually attracted regulatory fire:

• New York Attorney General (NYAG) 2019–2021: Investigated Tether and Bitfinex over undisclosed losses and misleading claims about reserves.

  • Settlement: $18.5 million fine.

  • Tether barred from operating in New York.

• CFTC 2021: Found that Tether misrepresented its reserves between 2016–2018, when only 27.6% of USDT was fully backed by dollars in bank accounts.

  • Settlement: $41 million fine.

Both cases revealed that Tether often lacked direct banking transparency, instead using loans, commercial paper, and affiliates to maintain liquidity.

7. Current State of Banking Ties (2022–2025)

Tether has become more cautious in recent years. While it still avoids naming all banking partners, reports indicate:

• Continued reliance on Deltec in the Bahamas.

• Expanded relationships with offshore banks in the Caribbean and Asia.

• Custody diversification into U.S. Treasuries, money market funds, and other assets (though exact custodians remain undisclosed).

As of 2025, Tether claims that the majority of its reserves are in short-term U.S. Treasuries, but it rarely discloses exact banking counterparties—maintaining the tradition of secrecy.

8. Why the Secrecy?

Several reasons explain Tether’s reluctance to name banks:

1. Fear of De-banking: Publicly naming institutions exposes them to regulatory pressure and reputational risk.

2. Legal Uncertainty: With ongoing scrutiny, banks may prefer anonymity.

3. Strategic Ambiguity: Keeping opponents guessing may shield Tether from coordinated crackdowns.

Still, secrecy fuels speculation and skepticism about whether reserves are as robust as claimed.

9. Risks of Undisclosed Banking

Tether’s undisclosed banking relationships pose systemic risks:

• Peg Stability Risk: If a banking partner collapses or seizes funds, USDT could de-peg.

• Liquidity Crunch: Lack of transparency makes it harder for markets to assess redemption ability.

• Regulatory Fallout: Global regulators could target Tether’s banks, creating contagion.

• Trust Erosion: Institutional investors may hesitate to use USDT compared to rivals like USDC.

10. Market Dependence on Tether

Despite controversies, Tether remains indispensable:

• It dominates crypto trading pairs, especially on offshore exchanges.

• Emerging markets use Tether for remittances, inflation hedging, and dollar substitutes.

• Its liquidity dwarfs competitors, making it the de facto reserve currency of crypto.

Paradoxically, the very opacity that alarms regulators hasn’t prevented adoption—if anything, traders prioritize liquidity over transparency.

11. Comparisons: USDC vs Tether

• USDC (Circle & Coinbase):

  • Fully audited.

  • U.S. banks and custodians disclosed.

  • More regulatory-friendly.

• Tether (iFinex):

  • Reserves disclosure is broad but lacks full audits.

  • Banking partners undisclosed.

  • Legal history of misrepresentation.

Yet, Tether still dwarfs USDC in supply—evidence that market utility can outweigh transparency.

12. The Future of Tether’s Banking

Looking forward, several trends could shape Tether’s undisclosed banking practices:

• Regulatory Pressure: The U.S. and EU are considering stablecoin frameworks that may force disclosures.

• Competition: If USDC or new entrants like PayPal’s PYUSD gain share, Tether may need to increase transparency.

• De-dollarization: With growing adoption outside the U.S., Tether may lean on offshore banks aligned with non-U.S. jurisdictions.

• Decentralized Alternatives: On-chain stablecoins (DAI, crvUSD, etc.) could eat into Tether’s dominance if trust erodes.

Conclusion

Tether’s undisclosed banking relationships remain one of the crypto industry’s biggest mysteries. From Wells Fargo to Noble, Deltec, and shadow intermediaries, its reliance on smaller, offshore institutions reflects both the challenges and ingenuity of operating in a system where mainstream banks refuse to serve crypto clients.

While critics warn of hidden fragility, the reality is that Tether has survived lawsuits, fines, scandals, and market panics—emerging larger each time. Its ability to adapt banking partners while maintaining a dollar peg speaks to resilience, but also underscores the risks of opacity in a trillion-dollar ecosystem.

Until Tether discloses its full banking ties, the stablecoin will remain both the backbone of crypto liquidity and one of its greatest systemic risks.

ALSO READ: The CIA’s alleged hand in Monero’s anonymity tech