India’s approach to cryptocurrency regulation has been a complex journey, marked by evolving policies and diverse perspectives from key stakeholders. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has consistently expressed concerns about the potential risks associated with cryptocurrencies, advocating for stringent regulations or outright prohibition. In contrast, other regulatory bodies, such as the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), have shown a willingness to explore oversight mechanisms that could integrate cryptocurrencies into the financial system under specific guidelines.
RBI’s Position on Cryptocurrencies
The RBI has maintained a cautious stance towards cryptocurrencies, citing concerns over financial stability, monetary policy efficacy, and consumer protection. In April 2018, the RBI issued a circular prohibiting its regulated entities from dealing with or providing services to individuals or businesses involved in virtual currencies. This directive effectively curtailed banking support for cryptocurrency transactions, leading to a significant decline in crypto-related activities within the formal financial sector.
However, in March 2020, the Supreme Court of India overturned the RBI’s 2018 circular, allowing banks to resume services for cryptocurrency transactions. Despite this judicial setback, the RBI’s apprehensions remained unchanged. Governor Shaktikanta Das reiterated the central bank’s concerns, emphasizing the potential risks cryptocurrencies pose to financial stability and the possibility of facilitating illicit activities.
SEBI’s Perspective
Contrary to the RBI’s prohibitive approach, SEBI has exhibited a more accommodative stance towards cryptocurrencies. In May 2024, SEBI proposed a multi-regulatory framework for overseeing cryptocurrency trade, suggesting that different regulators manage activities linked to cryptocurrencies within their respective domains. This approach indicates SEBI’s recognition of the growing significance of digital assets and the need for a structured regulatory environment that balances innovation with risk mitigation.
Government’s Legislative Efforts
The Indian government has been actively working towards formulating a comprehensive legal framework for cryptocurrencies. The Cryptocurrency and Regulation of Official Digital Currency Bill, 2021, aimed to establish a regulatory structure for digital assets while facilitating the creation of an official digital currency by the RBI. However, the bill has faced delays and has not been tabled in Parliament as of December 2024.
Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has highlighted the necessity for international collaboration in regulating or banning cryptocurrencies, given their inherently borderless nature. She emphasized that any legislation would be effective only after significant global cooperation to evaluate risks, benefits, and the development of common standards.
Taxation Policies
In a move to bring cryptocurrency transactions under the tax ambit, the Indian government introduced a 30% tax on gains from virtual assets, effective from April 1, 2022. Additionally, a 1% Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) on cryptocurrency transactions was implemented from July 1, 2022. These measures have impacted trading volumes on cryptocurrency exchanges in India, as traders adjust to the new tax liabilities.
Recent Developments
In 2024, India’s Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) took action against non-compliant offshore cryptocurrency exchanges. In June, the FIU imposed a penalty of approximately $2.25 million on Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange, for violating local anti-money laundering regulations. This enforcement underscores India’s commitment to ensuring that cryptocurrency operations within its jurisdiction adhere to established financial norms and legal requirements.
International Collaboration
Recognizing the global nature of cryptocurrencies, India has advocated for international cooperation in regulating digital assets. As the host of the G20 summit in 2023, India endorsed a joint declaration emphasizing the rapid implementation of the Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) and updates to the Common Reporting Standard. These frameworks aim to standardize the reporting of crypto transactions and facilitate the automatic exchange of taxpayer information between jurisdictions, reflecting the fast-growing crypto market.
Conclusion
India’s regulatory landscape for cryptocurrencies is characterized by a cautious yet evolving approach. While the RBI maintains significant reservations about the adoption of digital assets, other regulatory bodies and the government are exploring frameworks to integrate cryptocurrencies into the financial system responsibly. The emphasis on international collaboration highlights the recognition that effective regulation of cryptocurrencies requires a coordinated global effort. As the digital asset ecosystem continues to develop, India’s policies are likely to adapt, aiming to balance innovation with financial stability and consumer protection.
ALSO READ: Cryptocurrency Innovators: Women Transforming Blockchain
