The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has recently issued a 31-point advisory to investment bankers, calling for enhanced disclosures and increased due diligence for companies seeking to launch Initial Public Offerings (IPOs).
This advisory, aimed at bolstering transparency and investor protection, introduces several new requirements that could significantly impact the IPO process for companies, investment bankers, and legal firms alike.
Overview of the Advisory
SEBI’s advisory, communicated via email to investment bankers, emphasizes the necessity for thorough compliance with the Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements (ICDR) Regulations.
The guidelines insist that offer documents must adhere strictly to these new requirements, or they will be returned.
This has sparked concerns among industry experts about the potential for delays and increased complexity in the IPO process.
Key Requirements of the Advisory
Special Rights Under Articles of Association
One of the critical elements of SEBI’s advisory is the directive to cancel any special rights held by entities or individuals under the articles of association or shareholders’ agreements (SHA) before filing the updated draft red herring prospectus (UDRHP).
Previously, such rights were canceled post-listing to ensure equal rights for all non-promoter shareholders.
However, the new requirement means that these special rights must be forfeited even if the IPO does not proceed, which can be particularly concerning for private equity players and other significant investors.
Missing or Untraceable RoC Filings
Investment bankers must now inform the Registrar of Companies (RoC) of any missing or untraceable filings before submitting the draft prospectus.
This requirement aims to ensure that all regulatory documentation is up-to-date and complete, but it also introduces a layer of complexity.
Companies may be compelled to disclose potential issues to the RoC, which could initiate actions that the company might find challenging to address later.
Compliance with The Companies Act, 2013
The advisory mandates that bankers confirm and disclose the issuer company’s compliance with The Companies Act, 2013, regarding the issuance of securities from inception until the filing of the draft prospectus.
This includes verifying whether any investors are directly or indirectly related to the book running lead managers and their associates.
This level of scrutiny aims to prevent conflicts of interest but can be burdensome due to the sheer volume of shareholders that need to be examined.
Impact on the IPO Process
Delays and Increased Complexity
The new advisory is expected to make offer documents bulkier and could push back IPO timelines considerably.
The additional due diligence requirements mean that companies and their advisors will need to allocate more time and resources to ensure compliance.
This could delay the filing of prospectuses and the eventual listing of the company.
Concerns of Informal Guidelines
There is a growing concern among market participants that the frequent use of informal advisories may undermine the established ICDR regulations.
These advisories, while not law, carry significant weight and can lead to substantial changes in how IPOs are conducted.
Experts argue that SEBI should adopt a more consultative process and formalize these guidelines to maintain the integrity of the regulatory framework.
Specific Advisory Points
The advisory encompasses several specific points that investment bankers and companies must address in their IPO documentation:
Disclosure of ESOP Allottees: Investment bankers must disclose whether allottees under disclosed Employee Stock Option Schemes (ESOPs) are employees only and ensure that all grants of options comply with the Companies Act, 2013.
Provident Fund Dues: Details of employees whose Provident Fund dues are paid and unpaid must be provided. This transparency is crucial for assessing the company’s compliance with employee benefit regulations.
Regulatory Comments: All regulatory comments or observations must be incorporated into future filings, ensuring continuous compliance and transparency.
Secondary Transactions: Details of any acquisition of securities of the issuer through secondary transactions must be disclosed. This helps in understanding the ownership and transfer history of the company’s shares.
Industry Reactions
Concerns from Private Equity Players
The advisory’s requirement to cancel special rights before the IPO listing has raised significant concerns among private equity players.
These investors often negotiate special rights to protect their interests, and the new requirement to forfeit these rights before the IPO adds an element of uncertainty.
If an IPO does not proceed, private equity investors may lose these rights without any compensatory mechanism.
Investment Bankers’ Challenges
Investment bankers are tasked with a more extensive due diligence process, which includes verifying compliance with multiple regulatory requirements and disclosing relationships between investors and lead managers.
This additional workload can be daunting, especially given the volume of data that needs to be reviewed and disclosed.
Legal Firms’ Perspective
Legal firms assisting in the IPO process are also impacted. The need to ensure that all regulatory filings are complete and up to date adds a layer of complexity to the legal due diligence process.
Lawyers must work closely with companies and bankers to navigate these requirements effectively.
Potential Solutions and Future Outlook
Streamlining the Advisory Process
To address the concerns raised by the industry, SEBI could consider streamlining the advisory process.
This could involve formalizing the guidelines through amendments to the ICDR regulations after a thorough consultative process with stakeholders.
By doing so, SEBI can provide clarity and reduce the uncertainty associated with informal advisories.
Enhanced Communication and Support
SEBI could also enhance communication with market participants to provide clearer guidance and support.
This could include detailed workshops, webinars, and FAQs to help companies, bankers, and legal firms understand and implement the new requirements effectively.
Balancing Investor Protection and Market Efficiency
While the primary goal of the advisory is to enhance investor protection and market transparency, it is essential to balance these objectives with the need for market efficiency.
SEBI should consider the potential impact on the IPO process and strive to minimize disruptions while ensuring robust regulatory compliance.
SEBI’s 31-point advisory represents a significant step towards enhancing transparency and investor protection in the IPO process.
However, the additional requirements pose challenges for companies, investment bankers, and legal firms, potentially delaying IPO timelines and increasing the complexity of offer documents.
The concerns raised by industry experts highlight the need for a more consultative approach and the formalization of guidelines to maintain the integrity of the regulatory framework.
As the market adapts to these new requirements, it will be crucial for SEBI to provide clear guidance and support to ensure a smooth transition.
By balancing the goals of investor protection and market efficiency, SEBI can foster a more transparent and robust IPO market that benefits all stakeholders.
ALSO READ: Key Announcements and Developments in Indian Corporate Sector
