Walk into a bank branch to open a savings account or apply for a loan, and chances are you’ll meet a relationship manager (RM). Their job, at least officially, is to advise you, help with banking needs, and build trust. But in reality, many RMs today are salespeople under extreme pressure to cross-sell financial products.
One of their favorite tools? The Systematic Investment Plan (SIP).
SIPs, in themselves, are not scams. They are a disciplined way to invest in mutual funds. But when RMs push SIPs with false promises, hidden risks, and coercive tactics, what results is a systemic mis-selling racket that has already cost thousands of investors dearly.
This is the bank relationship manager SIP scam — an epidemic driven by sales targets, commission structures, and investor ignorance.
How the Scam Works
1. The Trust Trap
Customers trust banks as custodians of safety. When an RM recommends a product, clients often accept without scrutiny, assuming it is as safe as a fixed deposit.
2. False Promises of Guaranteed Returns
RMs pitch SIPs as risk-free investments, sometimes comparing them directly to fixed deposits, life insurance, or pension plans.
3. Aggressive Cross-Selling
Customers coming for routine services — like opening accounts or applying for loans — are pressured to start SIPs as an “eligibility requirement.”
4. Unsuitable Products
Conservative savers are pushed into high-risk small-cap or thematic SIPs that don’t align with their risk appetite.
5. Hidden Commissions
The real incentive: RMs earn commissions or performance credits based on SIP inflows, regardless of suitability for the customer.
6. Silence on Risks
The statutory disclaimer — “Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks” — is brushed aside or delivered as an afterthought.
Why Banks Encourage This
- Revenue Pressure: With interest margins shrinking, banks rely heavily on fee-based income.
- Targets Culture: RMs have monthly targets for SIP inflows, often tied to job security or bonuses.
- Easy Access to Clients: Banks already hold customer deposits and enjoy unmatched trust.
- Cross-Selling Mandates: Many banks tie lending or premium account benefits to investment purchases.
The Anatomy of Mis-Selling
- Coercion
Customers told SIPs are mandatory for account upgrades, credit cards, or loans. - Misinformation
RMs project unrealistic returns (12–15% CAGR) without showing risks of drawdowns. - Cherry-Picked Data
Only best-performing funds or periods are shown to lure customers. - Obscuring Liquidity Risks
Investors aren’t told that exiting SIPs during downturns can mean booking heavy losses. - Bundling with Insurance
SIPs sometimes pitched alongside ULIPs, further confusing customers about the product structure.
Case Studies
The Young Professional
A 26-year-old IT worker in Bengaluru was told by his bank RM that opening a SIP in a small-cap fund was a requirement for a premium salary account. Two years later, the fund had lost 30% of its value.
The Retired Couple
In Pune, a retired couple was convinced by their RM that SIPs in a mid-cap equity fund were safer than fixed deposits. When markets corrected in 2020, their savings eroded, and they were forced to liquidate at a loss.
The Loan Applicant
A business owner in Delhi seeking a working capital loan was told his approval would be “easier” if he agreed to start SIPs worth ₹25,000 monthly. The loan was sanctioned, but the SIPs later underperformed badly.
The Scale of the Problem
Industry insiders reveal that:
- In some banks, over 70% of retail SIP inflows are generated by RMs, often through mis-selling.
- Many customers don’t even realize they’ve invested in mutual funds until they see their account debits.
- Complaints to regulators and ombudsmen often highlight coercion and misinformation.
This is not a set of isolated incidents — it is a systemic practice baked into bank sales culture.
Why Customers Fall for It
- Bank Trust: Customers assume banks can’t mislead them.
- Financial Illiteracy: Most retail investors don’t understand SIP mechanics.
- Social Pressure: Customers hesitate to refuse bank staff for fear of losing service quality.
- Confusing Jargon: Terms like “NAV,” “rupee cost averaging,” and “compounding” are used to impress, not explain.
Consequences of the Scam
For Investors
- Financial losses due to unsuitable SIPs.
- Liquidity stress if markets fall and redemptions are needed.
- Disillusionment with mutual funds and capital markets.
For Banks
- Short-term fee income, but long-term reputational damage.
- Legal exposure if regulators crack down.
For the Economy
- Misallocation of household savings.
- Loss of trust in financialization — critical for economic growth.
Regulatory Oversight
Current Measures
- SEBI mandates risk disclosures and suitability checks.
- RBI requires banks to separate advisory and sales roles.
Why It Isn’t Enough
- Disclosures are buried in fine print.
- Suitability checks are tick-box exercises.
- Penalties for mis-selling are rare and mild.
Needed Reforms
- Plain-Language Risk Sheets given to every customer.
- Audio/Video Consent Records to prove risk explanation.
- Ban on Coercive Sales linking SIPs to loans or accounts.
- Strict RM Accountability with penalties for mis-selling.
Global Parallels
The SIP mis-selling scam mirrors scandals elsewhere:
- UK’s PPI Scandal: Payment protection insurance mis-sold by banks.
- U.S. Subprime Crisis: Risky mortgages packaged and sold to uninformed buyers.
- Asia’s Lehman Minibonds: Structured notes sold to retirees as safe products.
The common thread: trusted financial institutions exploiting retail ignorance.
The Human Angle
Mis-selling is not just about numbers. It’s about:
- A retiree losing security in old age.
- A young worker delaying life goals due to losses.
- Families questioning banks they once trusted.
These stories reveal the human cost of systemic mis-selling.
How Investors Can Protect Themselves
- Always Ask: Is this product market-linked? What are the risks?
- Read the Fine Print: Scheme documents matter more than sales brochures.
- Independent Research: Use online resources, not just bank advice.
- Avoid Pressure: No SIP is ever “mandatory” for accounts or loans.
- Diversify: Don’t let one RM dictate your entire investment strategy.
Could This Erupt Into a Full-Blown Scandal?
Yes. If markets suffer a prolonged downturn, millions of bank-led SIP investors could face steep losses. Outrage against mis-selling could spark legal cases, regulatory crackdowns, and a major reputational crisis for banks.
Conclusion
SIPs are not scams — they are valuable tools for disciplined investing. The scam lies in how they are sold. Bank relationship managers, driven by sales targets and incentives, often mislead customers with false guarantees, coercion, and unsuitable recommendations.
This mis-selling epidemic erodes trust not only in banks but in the financial system itself. The solution lies in stronger regulation, better investor education, and a cultural shift in banks from selling to genuinely advising.
Until then, every investor must remember: your RM’s loyalty is to sales targets, not to your financial goals.
ALSO READ: The political donor who bought influence via bonds
