In the history of crypto’s many booms and busts, few phenomena captured global attention like play-to-earn (P2E) gaming. The idea was simple but revolutionary: instead of paying to play video games, players could earn money by participating. Tokens, NFTs, and virtual assets would not only make gaming more immersive but also create real-world income streams—especially appealing in regions with limited economic opportunities.
For a brief moment in 2021, play-to-earn games promised to reshape both gaming and finance. Titles like Axie Infinity drew millions of players and billions in investment, while investors hyped P2E as the gateway to the metaverse. But like ICOs and NFTs before them, P2E experienced explosive hype cycles, where euphoric growth gave way to sharp collapse.
This is the story of those cycles—how they began, why they surged, and why they crashed.
1. The Play-to-Earn Concept
P2E gaming merged blockchain economics with traditional video games:
- Players bought NFTs (characters, items, land) to participate.
- By playing, they earned in-game tokens with real-world market value.
- Tokenomics created economic incentives to keep playing—and investing.
At its core, P2E blurred the line between work and play.
2. The Rise of Axie Infinity
No game embodied P2E’s hype cycle more than Axie Infinity:
- Mechanics: Players bought cartoonish NFT creatures (“Axies”) to battle and earn tokens.
- SLP tokens: Rewards could be cashed out for real money.
- Peak success: By 2021, Axie had over 2 million daily active users.
- Philippines boom: Many Filipinos treated Axie as a job, with “scholarship programs” renting Axies to new players.
At its peak, Axie generated over $1 billion in revenue.
3. The Hype Cycle Dynamics
Play-to-earn hype cycles typically followed a familiar pattern:
- Launch excitement: Promises of income attract early adopters.
- Speculative inflows: Investors buy NFTs and tokens, driving prices up.
- User surge: Retail players join, lured by success stories.
- Media spotlight: Coverage amplifies FOMO, bringing in more participants.
- Saturation: Token inflation dilutes rewards, new users can’t sustain old payouts.
- Collapse: Prices fall, players leave, and activity plunges.
This cycle mirrored other crypto manias, just packaged in games.
4. Unsustainable Tokenomics
The Achilles heel of P2E games was their economics:
- Rewards came from constant issuance of new tokens.
- Players sold tokens for cash, putting downward pressure on prices.
- Without enough new players buying in, the system resembled a Ponzi structure.
- Once token prices dropped, player incentives vanished.
For example, Axie’s SLP token fell from over $0.30 at its peak to fractions of a cent.
5. The Bust
By late 2021 and into 2022:
- Axie’s daily users dropped by more than 80%.
- NFT prices for Axies fell from hundreds of dollars to near-worthless levels.
- Rival P2E projects launched and died quickly, unable to sustain hype.
- Hacks (like the $600M Ronin exploit) further eroded trust.
The bust left many retail players, especially in developing countries, with devastating losses.
6. Other Play-to-Earn Experiments
Axie wasn’t alone—dozens of games launched during the boom:
- The Sandbox & Decentraland: Focused on land and metaverse play.
- Illuvium & Star Atlas: Promised AAA-quality blockchain games (still in development).
- StepN: A “move-to-earn” fitness twist, rewarding walking with tokens.
Most followed the same pattern: rapid hype, unsustainable growth, sharp correction.
7. The Role of VCs and Institutions
P2E wasn’t just retail hype—venture capital poured billions into gaming startups.
- Andreessen Horowitz, Animoca Brands, and Sequoia backed P2E ventures.
- Brands like Adidas and Ubisoft experimented with metaverse tie-ins.
- Institutional hype added fuel to already frothy valuations.
But when retail exited, even VC money couldn’t prevent collapse.
8. Community Impact
P2E left mixed legacies in its communities:
- Opportunities: For some, early profits were life-changing.
- Exploitation: Many latecomers effectively subsidized early winners.
- Digital labor debates: Critics argued P2E turned leisure into exploitative work.
- Cultural shift: Players began seeing games less as fun and more as financial bets.
The social cost of the bust was severe, especially where gaming income replaced jobs.
9. Lessons from the Hype Cycles
- Hype ≠ sustainability: Token-driven models can’t replace real utility.
- Speculation distorts play: When financial incentives dominate, fun disappears.
- Inflation kills ecosystems: Emission-heavy tokens collapse when demand falters.
- Community trust matters: Hacks and mismanagement accelerate decline.
- Narratives recycle: Like ICOs and NFTs, P2E showed how quickly hype moves on.
10. The Future of Blockchain Gaming
While the hype cycles burned many investors, the idea of blockchain gaming isn’t dead:
- Shift to “play-and-earn”: Games prioritize fun first, with tokens as secondary.
- Real utility: NFTs as interoperable in-game assets could have long-term value.
- Hybrid models: Combining free-to-play with optional token mechanics.
- Institutional interest remains: Major studios continue exploring Web3 gaming.
The next generation of blockchain games may avoid the mistakes of P2E hype cycles.
Conclusion
The play-to-earn hype cycles were one of crypto’s most surreal chapters—games turned into speculative markets, everyday players chased financial freedom, and billions flowed into digital economies that couldn’t sustain themselves.
Like other bubbles, P2E left behind both wreckage and valuable lessons. It showed the dangers of unsustainable tokenomics but also hinted at a future where blockchain gaming could thrive—if fun, not financialization, comes first.
ALSO READ: ESG investing — greenwashing or genuine?
