Japan’s Crypto Revolution: Inside the FSA’s New Two-Tier Regulatory Framework and What It Means for the Future of Digital Assets

Japan has long held a pivotal position in the global cryptocurrency ecosystem. As one of the first nations to legalize and regulate cryptocurrencies, the country has been at the forefront of shaping how digital assets are integrated into traditional financial frameworks. Now, Japan’s Financial Services Agency (FSA) is set to usher in a new era of regulation, marked by a clear bifurcation of crypto assets into two distinct categories under a recently released discussion paper titled “Verification of the state of the system related to crypto assets.”

With public feedback open until May 10, 2025, this policy initiative could not only influence domestic crypto markets but also shape international regulatory trends. By introducing a dual-framework system—Type 1 and Type 2 crypto assets—the FSA is attempting to tailor regulations that account for the unique nature and use cases of various digital currencies.

This article delves deep into the details of this proposal, the implications for both investors and crypto issuers, and what this could mean for the broader global crypto industry.

Understanding the Dual Classification: Type 1 and Type 2 Crypto Assets

The foundation of the FSA’s new discussion paper rests on a critical distinction: how crypto assets are used, particularly in relation to business funding and decentralization.

🔹 Type 1: Business-Oriented Crypto Assets

Type 1 crypto assets are defined as those used to raise funds or serve a business purpose for the development of a project. These assets often belong to emerging projects that are still in the early stages of development and rely on token issuance to support operations and growth. They resemble what global regulators often classify as “security tokens” due to their fundraising nature.

Examples: Altcoins from new blockchain startups or decentralized application (dApp) platforms that conduct Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) or Token Generation Events (TGEs) to raise capital.

Regulatory Outlook for Type 1:

• Token issuers must disclose comprehensive project information, including:
  • The intended use of funds
  • Roadmap and technical details
  • Potential investor risks
  • Governance structure
• Issuers must adhere to disclosure obligations set by the FSA, similar to requirements for traditional securities.
• If a Type 1 asset garners a large base of general investors, it may fall under the purview of Japan’s Securities Token Regulations.
• Importantly, while the regulations demand transparency from issuers, the FSA notes difficulty in directly identifying and regulating these entities—especially in decentralized setups.

This creates a gray area for enforcement, especially when the project is launched anonymously or operates globally beyond Japanese jurisdiction.

🔹 Type 2: Decentralized, Non-Fundraising Crypto Assets

Type 2 assets are more established cryptocurrencies that are not used for fundraising or tied directly to a parent company’s capital requirements. Instead, they function primarily as decentralized value transfer tools.

Examples: Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH), the two largest and most decentralized networks in existence.

Regulatory Outlook for Type 2:

• These assets are regulated primarily through crypto exchanges and service providers.
• Exchanges must report substantial price fluctuations and market-impacting behaviors to the FSA.
• Issuers of these assets, often non-existent or diffuse (as with Bitcoin), are not held directly accountable due to the decentralized nature of the technology.
• Regulation centers on ensuring market integrity and investor protection at the trading level.

This allows the FSA to focus its regulatory oversight on market intermediaries rather than attempting to control the decentralized networks themselves.

Transparency and Investor Protection: The Core of the New Regulatory Push

Japan’s FSA is emphasizing transparency and informed investing as the cornerstones of its Type 1 regulation. By requiring disclosures similar to those found in public securities offerings, the agency aims to protect investors from projects that lack viable fundamentals or that engage in misleading fundraising tactics.

In addition, the FSA’s approach reflects concerns stemming from recent global crypto collapses—such as Terra/Luna and FTX—where investors were blindsided due to a lack of clear, consistent information about how their funds were being used.

The regulatory system appears to be inspired by traditional financial frameworks, where investor disclosures are mandatory before securities can be listed or traded. The key difference is the challenge of enforcement, particularly in a world where crypto projects can operate pseudonymously or across borders.

Exchange Platforms as the New Regulatory Gatekeepers

Given the FSA’s acknowledgment that identifying and regulating Type 1 crypto issuers may not always be feasible, the agency will rely more heavily on crypto exchanges as intermediaries. This strategy is particularly pronounced for Type 2 assets, where issuers are non-existent or out of reach.

Exchange firms are now expected to:

• Monitor and report significant market volatility
• Flag suspicious price movements or manipulation
• Enforce compliance standards internally
• Ensure proper Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) protocols

Effectively, exchanges will function as regulatory enforcement arms, echoing similar strategies employed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and European regulators in recent years.

Global Influence: Will Other Countries Follow Suit?

One of the most interesting aspects of this regulatory evolution is Japan’s openness to global perspectives. The FSA has explicitly stated that public feedback and international regulatory trends will inform its final policy.

This indicates an intent to align, at least partially, with global frameworks such as:

• The MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets) regulation in the European Union
• The SEC’s pursuit of classifying certain tokens as securities
• The FATF (Financial Action Task Force) guidelines on virtual asset service providers

If successful, Japan’s dual-framework system could become a blueprint for other advanced economies looking to regulate the crypto space without stifling innovation.

Cryptocurrencies as Financial Products: A Paradigm Shift

Another significant revelation in the discussion paper is the FSA’s proposal to revise the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA). Under this revision—expected to be submitted to the Japanese parliament as early as 2026—cryptocurrencies would no longer be categorized as payment instruments.

Instead, they would be recognized as a distinct financial product category, separate from traditional currency or securities.

Implications of This Shift:

• Crypto assets may receive custom-tailored tax, accounting, and reporting treatment.
• Investors may be eligible for different types of consumer protection.
• It opens up new legal pathways for treating crypto like commodities or derivatives, depending on their use.

By doing this, Japan would become one of the first nations to formally separate cryptocurrencies from fiat currencies and securities—solidifying their place in a third, dedicated financial ecosystem.

Potential Challenges and Criticisms

While the framework is ambitious and forward-looking, it is not without its potential challenges:

1. Enforcement Difficulties for Type 1 Projects: Without a concrete issuer or legal entity, regulation enforcement could falter.
2. High Compliance Costs for Small Projects: Emerging startups may find the disclosure requirements burdensome, stifling early-stage innovation.
3. Overreliance on Exchanges: Holding exchanges responsible for market conduct can lead to centralization pressures, contradicting the decentralized ethos of crypto.
4. Legal Ambiguity for Global Tokens: Many tokens operate internationally; local regulation may struggle to keep pace with borderless crypto economies.

However, these challenges are not unique to Japan. They reflect the broader complexity of regulating a decentralized financial system within the constraints of centralized legal frameworks.

Final Thoughts: A Step Toward Maturity

Japan’s new regulatory proposal represents a bold and mature approach to crypto governance. By distinguishing between business-centric and decentralized digital assets, the FSA acknowledges that a one-size-fits-all approach simply doesn’t work for crypto.

This framework:

• Encourages responsible innovation
• Promotes investor protection
• Offers legal clarity without overreach
• Positions Japan as a global thought leader in crypto regulation

As the May 10 deadline for public feedback approaches, crypto stakeholders around the world—developers, investors, exchanges, and regulators—will be watching closely. The final iteration of this framework could set a precedent not only for Japan but also for the broader global financial system grappling with the integration of blockchain technologies.

Whether you’re a casual investor, a blockchain startup, or a regulatory analyst, one thing is clear: Japan’s crypto future is no longer on the sidelines—it’s being shaped now, in real time, through a participatory, transparent process that might just become a model for the world.

ALSO READ: Tariff Relief Sparks Bitcoin Bounce to $80K